Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fuuma 
Clothing design doesn't use proprietary features to attain an interesting whole so I have no idea what you're talking about. Going to a tailor and having him copy the TF style is an implicit recognition of the power of his design, if anything.
Whether you can achieve an interesting whole that amounts to more than the sum of a garment's features is, to me, an unresolvable query. But to answer your point, I never said one should ask a tailor to copy Tom Ford's styling, only that I have yet to see any evidence that there is such a thing beyond the few features that people have identified individually, and that a competent bespoke tailor should be able to execute those features (after all, Zegna's factory workers can).
Also, whatevever the merits of Tom Ford's work, its evaluation should be contained within the context of ready-to-wear. Even
if his lapels are good for a model that must be scaled to fit as many people as possible, why suppose they are optimal for any one person? If someone says, "I want a Tom Ford suit," it's perfectly reasonable to question whether he has considered options that might be better for him individually .
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fuuma 
As for your overarching point; while design and art may not be the same they share enough characteristics that I'm confident they can be used in a funny retort together without denaturing the overall jab.

This depends on how funny you think your retort is

.