or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Expensive pocket squares
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Expensive pocket squares

post #1 of 118
Thread Starter 
Purchasing an expensive pocket square (unless you absolutely adore the design and can't find it anywhere else) seems silly to me.

That said I would have told you the same thing about suits a couple of years ago. SO basically my question is regarding what you get for your money. Is there some gain to superior construction that benefits an accessory that receives absolutely NO wear and tear? Noone touches it so quality silk shouldn't matter.

For that matter what does the board think of going to straight up handkerchiefs? If well ironed wouldn't they function much the same? I've always romanticized the idea of being as old school and practical with my accessories as possible, plus it would be pretty amazing to whip out a linen handkerchief for a crying woman.
post #2 of 118
There is something to be said for a fabric -- whether cotton, linen, wool or silk -- with some body. No matter how you fold it, you want to show the right amount. Flimsy squares tend to sink into the pocket and disappear, and or droop in an unattractive way. I have a few like this, and I find that I reach for them less frequently than the ones I know to be good.

Also, a tight, neat hand rolled edge looks nice, and it will cost more.
post #3 of 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manton View Post
There is something to be said for a fabric -- whether cotton, linen, wool or silk -- with some body. No matter how you fold it, you want to show the right amount. Flimsy squares tend to sink into the pocket and disappear, and or droop in an unattractive way. I have a few like this, and I find that I reach for them less frequently than the ones I know to be good.

Also, a tight, neat hand rolled edge looks nice, and it will cost more.

I find that, irrespective of price, puffed silken squares want to creep out of the pocket. Folded cotton and linen squares tend to sink.

I bought a few expensive squares when I first got into wearing them after reading Flusser's "Dressing." These days I would be disinclined to spend more than $25 on a square, maybe $30 as an absolute maximum. I am inclined to agree with the OP.
post #4 of 118
As far as I know, a "pocket square" is just bastardized American for a gentleman's handkerchief.

Sometimes it's worth paying a little more for a nice fabric or a pattern you really like (for those in corporate uniform, this is often their only opportunity for free-style self expression). However, when you see the hankies with triple-digit price tags ..... try to remember that their real purpose is as a portable snot rag!
post #5 of 118
i thought the same thing until i received a RL Purple Label linen square as a gift, its practically the only one i wear anymore.
post #6 of 118
It seems that there is a world of difference between a 5 dollar one and a thirty dollar one, but after that you are just paying for the brand name/design. And with Kent Wang's offering on the forum its seems there is no need to spend more then 30 bucks for a quality square.
post #7 of 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLibourel View Post
I find that, irrespective of price, puffed silken squares want to creep out of the pocket. Folded cotton and linen squares tend to sink.

I bought a few expensive squares when I first got into wearing them after reading Flusser's "Dressing." These days I would be disinclined to spend more than $25 on a square, maybe $30 as an absolute maximum. I am inclined to agree with the OP.

I find that Irish linen never sinks. The French linen tends to. Cheap silk sinks. Good gum twill does not. That's how it happes with me, anyway.

The best reason to buy a nice square in any case is the quality of the printing and the design. My favorites were all probably around $50.

Then again, lately, I have mostly been wearing BB Irish linen that cost $15 for a three pack in the early '90s.
post #8 of 118
same thoughts on high quality irish linen, absolute fav of mine.
post #9 of 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLibourel View Post
I find that, irrespective of price, puffed silken squares want to creep out of the pocket. Folded cotton and linen squares tend to sink. I bought a few expensive squares when I first got into wearing them after reading Flusser's "Dressing." These days I would be disinclined to spend more than $25 on a square, maybe $30 as an absolute maximum. I am inclined to agree with the OP.
I dont wear the cotton or linen ones as much myself anymore. Although a nice white linen pocket square can be very sharp, I find that the same issues dont arise that used to with silk pocket squares, namely that you will clash the texture of the silk with that of the tie. We live in a woven tie world now and the printed silk square is a terrific companion. I also get woven pocket squares which due to their stiffer construction work better in smaller square sizes. About the puff coming out. Although I dont know how much you mean, unless you have very shallow breast pockets, they dont come out that much if you double them over, with the points upward but hidden behind the "puffy center" of the silk. I think that the age when only a slight bit poking out was a sign of gentility has disappeared and the current way of dressing is to let more show anyway. Remember the current impetus for wearing tailored clothes is pageantry and not work uniforms.
post #10 of 118
Links to white silk squares that can be purchased online, I think I need a few more...
post #11 of 118
It's with regard to sinking in and falling out that I think larger squares have the advantage. The extra volume tends to keep a square in place on way or another.
post #12 of 118
The disappearing pocket square, like the flaccid tie knot, is one of life's tragedies that seems to have skipped me.

A pocket square, even an expensive one, is still a somewhat trivial sartorial cost, so why not be relatively extravagant?

For silk squares, the quality of the prints (the silk, the number of dyes used, etc.) and the fineness of the sewing in the rolled edge seem to me not to top off until you get to the realm of the most pricey.



For other fabrics, the differences are still meaningful:





As is mining the past:



- B
post #13 of 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manton View Post
There is something to be said for a fabric -- whether cotton, linen, wool or silk -- with some body. No matter how you fold it, you want to show the right amount. Flimsy squares tend to sink into the pocket and disappear, and or droop in an unattractive way. I have a few like this, and I find that I reach for them less frequently than the ones I know to be good.

Also, a tight, neat hand rolled edge looks nice, and it will cost more.

+1
post #14 of 118
I was in Ralph Lauren today and saw pocket squares for $125. I did a double-take and went back to check... yup, one hundred and twenty five dollars. Had there been a sales assistant around I would have asked for an explanation of what made those ones so much better than the others at $75 (which I still find pretty steep).
post #15 of 118
Damn, I remember when $125 was an expensive tie. I can't imagine paying that for a square.

I think the most I have ever paid was $60, but I can't remember.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Expensive pocket squares