or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › ***The official Alden thread ***
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

***The official Alden thread *** - Page 2386

post #35776 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by makewayhomer View Post

right, I agree with your thinking
I mean, my answer has basically been the same for years now:
if you are trying to decide between a rare color shell or #8, get the rare color. burgundy shell is always going to be much easier to find down the road, and also can be bought a ton cheaper if you are ok with vintage Florsheim/Hanover, which were probably better made than Alden today.
for anyone on a budget or picking and choosing between models, buying a #8 LWB or PTB from Alden for $650 or w/e...I think that's pretty crazy. lurk on B/S or Ebay and get some barely worn vintage model for $150.
if you have unlimited funds, then disregard my advice!

I would say it's more reasonable to pay $600 for a LHW or LWB than for a rare shell color, assuming your goal is to build a solid wardrobe rather than build bragging rights on the Style Forum official Alden Thread.
post #35777 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenfoldtieguy View Post

It is crazy how cheap some of these models go for on ebay. In early 2011 I scored a NOS vintage Hanover PTB (late 1970's) in color 4 for $175. I felt almost guilty as it was quite apparent the seller had no idea the real worth of this shoe.

congrats on that score

I have AE in "black cherry" shell (which was the marketed term they used in their catalogs) - which to my eye is like #6 - and I have Hanover in a nearly identical color. Was yours marked #4 in some way, or is that just what your eyes are telling you ?

the recent #4 from Alden I saw was much more RED than the black cherry I have, which has more burgundy overtones.

my vintage shoes next to my current C&J burgundy shell PTB



vintage black cherry vs vintage burgundy



#4

post #35778 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDave View Post

I would say it's more reasonable to pay $600 for a LHW or LWB than for a rare shell color, assuming your goal is to build a solid wardrobe rather than build bragging rights on the Style Forum official Alden Thread.

I can't speak for makewayhomer, but my goal is definitely to build a solid wardrobe that suits my needs. Granted, I picked up the ravello PTBs partly because they are rare, but mainly because I happen to love the PTB in that color, and also because I think it will suit my needs well.
post #35779 of 93961

I'm grabbing a pair of shoes 10.5D on Grant last. Do you think I should use AE M or L shoe trees?

post #35780 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenfoldtieguy View Post


It is crazy how cheap some of these models go for on ebay. In early 2011 I scored a NOS vintage Hanover PTB (late 1970's) in color 4 for $175. I felt almost guilty as it was quite apparent the seller had no idea the real worth of this shoe.

 

That's a great pick-up

post #35781 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDave View Post

I would say it's more reasonable to pay $600 for a LHW or LWB than for a rare shell color, assuming your goal is to build a solid wardrobe rather than build bragging rights on the Style Forum official Alden Thread.

well, again, if your goal is to build a wardrobe that means acquiring different colors types and shoe styles. the burgundy shell LWB and PTB are 100% staples - but they are also easy to find at equivalent quality and much lower price than from Alden. but cigar is also a pretty important part of that wardrobe, and even ravello will functionality look a lot better with some outfits than #8 will. so they are not just Ferrari style exotics, they are also functionally very useful. and, they are very hard or impossible to find at any kind of discount.

so I'm just saying if you have say $1,500 dollars allocated to shoe purchases over the next 2 years and want to start building a small and useful collection, I think it's a better choice to pay full retail for the stuff you absolutely you need to pay full retail for - and save money on the stuff you can save money on.
post #35782 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by zippyh View Post

Weather is cooling so I got the cordovan wingtip boots out of storage.
Ravello, black, cigar Aldens and a pair of C&J for Polo Lindricks.
coolboots.jpg

we've enjoyed some spectacular fall weather in the pnw, but i'm almost ready for our typical dreariness to set in so i can regularly wear my boots.
almost.
post #35783 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by makewayhomer View Post

well, again, if your goal is to build a wardrobe that means acquiring different colors types and shoe styles. the burgundy shell LWB and PTB are 100% staples - but they are also easy to find at equivalent quality and much lower price than from Alden. but cigar is also a pretty important part of that wardrobe, and even ravello will functionality look a lot better with some outfits than #8 will. so they are not just Ferrari style exotics, they are also functionally very useful. and, they are very hard or impossible to find at any kind of discount.
so I'm just saying if you have say $1,500 dollars allocated to shoe purchases over the next 2 years and want to start building a small and useful collection, I think it's a better choice to pay full retail for the stuff you absolutely you need to pay full retail for - and save money on the stuff you can save money on.

I'm more willing to pay for staples. My LWB (color 8) and LHSs (black and color 8) get quite a lot of wear. For the light color that I wear less often, I'll take a cheaper pair of walnut AE Strands.

Neither is necessarily right or wrong. Just different views/approaches.
post #35784 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa Doble View Post

I recently picked up my first Aldens, ravello PTBs, and am contemplating my next acquisition(s). My work environment is very casual, so they'd mostly be worn with denim and chinos, perhaps sometimes with a jacket, but not a suit. I'm thinking (current collection sans PTBs here):
  1. cigar LHS
  2. #8 LWB
  3. #8 NST boot: barrie last, commando sole
EDIT: I'm interested in hearing feedback on the above 3 and any suggestions that are not among the above 3.

They're all great selections. Have you considered a #8 Chukka? This was the second pair of Aldens I bought and I really like mine. The style/color is really versatile. For the LWB, I got mine in cigar from AoC.
post #35785 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by wigglr View Post

I'm grabbing a pair of shoes 10.5D on Grant last. Do you think I should use AE M or L shoe trees?
those ae shoe trees are mighty small compared to the rochester (alden) ones. i use ae large in all of my ae's and rochester medium in my aldens, and i am a 9.5 barrie/9 eee in most ae lasts. for these reasons, i would suggest ae L.
post #35786 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by sqroot3 View Post


those ae shoe trees are mighty small compared to the rochester (alden) ones. i use ae large in all of my ae's and rochester medium in my aldens, and i am a 9.5 barrie/9 eee in most ae lasts. for these reasons, i would suggest ae L.


Thanks for your help. Saving some money here: I have an extra L lying around :)

post #35787 of 93961
post #35788 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by macjedi View Post

They're all great selections. Have you considered a #8 Chukka? This was the second pair of Aldens I bought and I really like mine. The style/color is really versatile. For the LWB, I got mine in cigar from AoC.

I do already own a suede chukka, but I think I'll consider a #8 or cigar chukka.
post #35789 of 93961
Quote:
Originally Posted by wigglr View Post


Thanks for your help. Saving some money here: I have an extra L lying around smile.gif
haha...
oh man is he asking for it!
post #35790 of 93961
I'm honestly curious if there's a story behind this since Alden is a company with a lot of quirks... is there a reason Alden seems to use boxes that are just a bit too small?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › ***The official Alden thread ***