Quote:
Originally Posted by
aerether 
Turned down Princeton, Columbia, Cornell, and UPenn (among others) for MIT. Let's see how this turns out. (check back in half a decade ok?)
Hey, I'm a senior in Course 2 here at MIT. Are you there for undergrad or Phd? I would agree with most of the sentiments in this thread about access to resources, the diverse/intellectual people that you will meet. On top of that, the student have accomplishments that are incredible and thus this theme is continued while studying at the school. The academic environment also attracts more funding, people with power, and usually there are students ambitious enough to tackle something new and important. The biggest factor at at schools with less resources are bureaucracy, mainly administration or professors shooting down new/risky ideas instead of continuously pushing the envelope for research and initiatives. For me, I got into the engineering schools at CMU, Illinois, Northwestern, Purdue and MIT. I would have went to MIT regardless, but to illustrate the point of available resources, it was cheaper for me to attend MIT on need based aid, than to attend the other schools for merit based aid. MIT does not do merit based aid because obviously, it would be hard to choose who shines overall in the class. It is not just the school or the name that makes a difference. The area, it's history, intellectual atmosphere, and the people it attracts are also huge factors that must be observed to be appreciated. I would try to explain, but I think Paul Graham does a better job with it in his article, "Cities and Ambition", linked below. This is why I am applying to Stanford and Berkeley Graduate school, even though I am already at the arguably "best" engineering school in the world.
http://www.paulgraham.com/cities.html