Thanks that clears things up.
I'm still in 1L - so I was just curious where 3 pieces fit in.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
One more question: Is the Florsheim Kenmoor Cap Toe an acceptable, affordable substitution for AE park ave?
http://www.florsheim.com/shop/style/17108-01.html
Thank you.

One more question: Is the Florsheim Kenmoor Cap Toe an acceptable, affordable substitution for AE park ave?
http://www.florsheim.com/shop/style/17108-01.html
Thank you.
One more word of advice - I would not wear a three piece suit to an interview. In the legal world I get the impression it is bad form to dress above your station. You likewise do not want to stand out too much by showing up with a $1500 suit and $600 shoes, etc. Interviews are not fashion shows - they are a moment in which your judgment is judged. Conservative attire is key. A little flair is ok, but not so much that your judgment/personality is called into question.

Surely you jest, Harvey. You could do a LOT worse than those and believe me, I've seen law students do a lot worse than those, even at interviews. I am less than a decade removed from law school and believe that you could even pass with a pair of black Cole Haan captoes (gasp!). In an interview or mixer situation, they're just checking to be sure you don't have white tube socks on and your shoes are black, and that they match your belt (and that you have a belt). They're not going to examine the stitching and ask where you bought them. If you are a poor law student, for $100 you can get a nice pair of Cole Haan captoes that will last you through most interviewing situations and be very comfortable (but they won't last much longer than that). They key in an interview is to be comfortable and to at least pass for the part you are playing. More substantive attire can be acquired after you graduate. I also kind-of think that an interviewer could just as easily size you up and decide you are not hungry enough for their firm if you can already afford AEs or a $1200 suit. In my experience, I've found that law firms like their associates poor and in debt. Squalor is a motivating factor.



If the suit doesn't fit, you must acquit!
Another benefit of a matching suit vest - if you're a dolt and drop mustard on your dress shirt at lunch, the vest can hide many such mortal sins (even to some extent it can hide the ill-fitting or cheaply made dress shirt/tie, etc.). Plus, if the interview goes poorly, you'll look great with the vest on and jacket off hustling pool. And, completely unrelated to law and interviews (but maybe not) - women love men in three piece suits. No idea why, they just do (well, I do have one or two theories, but I digress).
This may just be my own opinion or experience, but investment banker attire is most definitely not equivalent to attorney attire (sorry for the alliteration, I couldn't help myself). Attorneys on the whole tend to be more conservative, or even perhaps the most conservative, dressers as a profession. I would not transpose the advice about attorney ... garb onto the banker profession; they're apples and oranges (or maybe tangelos and navels?). Just my two cents.
