or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Ask A Question, Get An Answer... - Post All Quick Questions Here (Classic menswear)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ask A Question, Get An Answer... - Post All Quick Questions Here (Classic menswear) - Page 1072

post #16066 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by E,TF View Post


Thumbs down. Too busy.

The color scheme looks good but a similar tie that is just plain stripes would do.  The dots in between the stripes makes the whole attire look too heavy on patterns. 

post #16067 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by E,TF View Post


How about no socks, seeing as you're on the beach?

I think pink socks would work great given that the shirt is pink and white stripes.  I'd avoid blue as it would be too much blue in one area (i.e pants and socks)

post #16068 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAsia View Post

I'd avoid blue as it would be too much blue in one area (i.e pants and socks)
There's nothing inherently wrong about one's socks matching one's pants.

That having been said, I'd wear my blue and pink argyles. Not that argyles are the first thing I think of in connection with beachwear, but in this case it'd work nicely, particularly given the pink and white shirt.

And sap23 - Don't go fretting too much over your sock choices. Pretty much any wedding where boat shoes are acceptable attire is sufficiently informal that devoting more than very modest thought to your choice of socks is unnecessary and uncalled for. It's like attending a wedding held at an amusement park, and worrying over which color t-shirt goes best with your shorts. Even E,TF's suggestion of going sockless is not necessarily inappropriate for a casual beach wedding.
--
Michael
post #16069 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by poissa View Post

I am looking to get a pair of FU pants (bold in pattern - not necessarily color), so could be plaid, windowpane, or something else, haven't thought too much about the pattern. I would want the FU component to pair with a navy sportcoat. Do any of our forum sponsors make some such RTW?
I don't know that they're a forum sponsor, but I noticed yesterday that Jos. A. Bank has their madras pants on clearance for under $25 (from a ridiculously inflated "regular" price of about $125). They'd be a classic FU choice for wearing with a navy blazer. And assuming one could use a "$20 off $20" JAB coupon (which is currently being discussed here and there - I'm going to stop by my local JAB tore later this afternoon and see if it'll fly), that'd bring the cost of the pants down to about $5. Heck, wear 'em once, just as a joke, and you've practically gotten your five bucks' worth.
--
Michael
post #16070 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12345Michael54321 View Post

There's nothing inherently wrong about one's socks matching one's pants.

Indeed, in fact it's quite the opposite, matching socks to trousers is the most obvious and proper choice. It's not compulsory, contrasting socks are an option too, but it's certainly never wrong.
post #16071 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanguis Mortuum View Post

matching socks to trousers is the most obvious and proper choice.
Quite. If my suggestion that the pants/socks match wasn't wrong sounded a trifle weak, it's only that I wanted to be gentle in my taking exception to RCAsia's stance on the matter.

Of course, I also applaud the notion that "A businessman matches his socks to his trousers. A gentleman matches his socks to his mood." smile.gif
--
Michael

(Currently wearing socks which match... pretty much nothing else that I'm wearing, although one of the stripe colors does match a minor color in my necktie. Ofttimes, "compatibility" is preferable to "matchiness." This particularly applies to the interaction between ties and pocket squares, but it touches upon sock choice, too.)
post #16072 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12345Michael54321 View Post

I don't know that they're a forum sponsor, but I noticed yesterday that Jos. A. Bank has their madras pants on clearance for under $25 (from a ridiculously inflated "regular" price of about $125). They'd be a classic FU choice for wearing with a navy blazer. And assuming one could use a "$20 off $20" JAB coupon (which is currently being discussed here and there - I'm going to stop by my local JAB tore later this afternoon and see if it'll fly), that'd bring the cost of the pants down to about $5. Heck, wear 'em once, just as a joke, and you've practically gotten your five bucks' worth.
--
Michael

Thanks for the heads-up. If I wasn't lazy I'd give it a shot.
post #16073 of 33197
Are you supposed to button your suit jacket's top or other buttons when hanging it up?
post #16074 of 33197

What's the style forum opinion of Billy Reid?  I was trying on a navy sportcoat marked down to ~$450 today that I really liked, just want to think it over before I dive in.

 

Thanks!

post #16075 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jslade View Post

Are you supposed to button your suit jacket's top or other buttons when hanging it up?

No. It won't hang properly (flat) and could lead to wrinkles.
post #16076 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jslade View Post

Are you supposed to button your suit jacket's top or other buttons when hanging it up?
Shirts get buttoned, suit jackets don't. (And sweaters get folded and placed in a drawer or on a shelf.)
post #16077 of 33197

When you go on a trip (3-4 days), do you bring multiple pair of shoes or is it ok to wear the same pair for this long in a row, putting in shoe trees at night? Rephrased: how long before the moisture would hurt the leather?

post #16078 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnovc View Post

how long before the moisture would hurt the leather?
There's no definite answer to that question. It's probably best not to wear the same shoes every day, but neither is it like infrequently violating this rule will cause your shoes to fall apart or shorten their usable lifespans by a guaranteed 65%.

It's a little like how eating chocolate cake every day isn't a recommended dietary practice. But if an otherwise healthy adult happens to attend 3 birthday parties in 3 days, and has a slice of chocolate cake at each one, he probably hasn't caused himself permanent ill health or shortened his life. (You people who are allergic to chocolate, shut up. And as for you folks with a tendency toward diabetes, you'll note that I did specify "healthy" adult.)

If you want to get by with a single pair of shoes for a 3-4 day trip, just do it. Assuming you don't make a weekly practice of this, and that you aren't walking through ankle-deep puddles, it's not anything worth worrying about. (Besides, they're shoes; they're meant to be worn. I guarantee you that most men aren't even aware that shoes should be "rested" for a day between wearings, and their shoes don't necessarily fall to pieces after having been worn for 4 straight days. In short, don't fret over it.)

All this having been said, I usually bring more than one pair of shoes if I'm going away for several days, if only because different shoes serve different purposes and may more effectively cover a wider variety of situations. Yeah, a second pair of shoes adds a little weight to, and takes up some space in, my luggage. I'm okay with that. I don't believe that the Flying Spaghetti Monster punishes us in the afterlife because we traveled with an "overnight plus"-sized bag, instead of the smaller overnight-sized bag. And for a mere 3-4 day trip, I'm not going to be taking so much stuff that I'm likely to be hit with significant "baggage surcharge" fees, assuming I'm flying. (I've also been known to wear my old Photographer's Vest, if I'm flying. The thing has multiple medium, large, and extra large pockets, and can probably hold about as much as a second carry-on piece, but because it's technically a garment, and not a bag, I've never been charged extra for wearing it. Not even when it was loaded down with 20+ lbs. of clothes, books, gear, etc. Upon boarding, it gets stuffed into the overhead compartment, of course.)
--
Michael
Edited by 12345Michael54321 - 7/19/12 at 7:18pm
post #16079 of 33197
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12345Michael54321 View Post

Shirts get buttoned, suit jackets don't. (And sweaters get folded and placed in a drawer or on a shelf.)
Thanks, Michael. I appreciate the input. That's what I figured, since suit jackets hang strangely when buttoned on a hanger. But I just wanted to make sure. wink.gif
post #16080 of 33197
Cotton braided belts? Yea or nay?
Leather tipped, O-ring, D-ring? Any preferences? My thinking is they are somewhat less versatile (restricted to spring/summer) than leather belts which are more 4 season wear.

Examples:

Link

Link
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Ask A Question, Get An Answer... - Post All Quick Questions Here (Classic menswear)