Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › "Natural" Girls appreciation Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Natural" Girls appreciation Thread

post #1 of 40
Thread Starter 
OK. After all the "appreciation" threads featuring girls done up by makeup artists and photoshopped within an inch of their life- how about a "How do they really look
thread? The definitive test of looks.

The results should be surprising.

Post away gents. Remember-no skanks, no makeup, no photoshop.
post #2 of 40
Wait, you mean a fat/ugly girls appreciation thread? Why not just make a "post pictures of your wife" thread?
post #3 of 40
Oh, I thought this was going to be a thead in appreciation of girls that didn't have boob jobs, along the lines of Playboy's "Natural Beauties" special editions. I know some men dislike boob jobs, but I fear that they have rather spoiled the real thing for most of us. On the notorious "advanced forum" not long ago someone posted some pix of Jayne Mansfield, who certainly had one of the most spectacular busts of her time, but as I remarked in that thread, her boobs looked no better than "eh, okay" compared to the spectacular, surgically enhanced variety we encounter these days.
post #4 of 40
Did you mean:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian SD View Post
Wait, you mean a fat/ugly girls appreciation thread? Why not just make a "post pictures of MY wife" thread?
post #5 of 40
This is not what the internet was meant for.
post #6 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian SD View Post
Wait, you mean a fat/ugly girls appreciation thread? Why not just make a "post pictures of your wife" thread?

Because rnoldh spam would quickly overload the internet.
post #7 of 40
I PREFER COLUMN B!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
post #8 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLibourel View Post
Oh, I thought this was going to be a thead in appreciation of girls that didn't have boob jobs, along the lines of Playboy's "Natural Beauties" special editions. I know some men dislike boob jobs, but I fear that they have rather spoiled the real thing for most of us. On the notorious "advanced forum" not long ago someone posted some pix of Jayne Mansfield, who certainly had one of the most spectacular busts of her time, but as I remarked in that thread, her boobs looked no better than "eh, okay" compared to the spectacular, surgically enhanced variety we encounter these days.
We already have that thread (or it least it's supposed to be all-natural only): http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=70207
Quote:
Originally Posted by GQgeek View Post
Because rnoldh spam would quickly overload the internet.
Exactly. I have had about enough of that shit.
post #9 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian278 View Post
We already have that thread (or it least it's supposed to be all-natural only):
http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=70207



Exactly. I have had about enough of that shit.

But its his trainer!!!
post #10 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by amerikajinda View Post
She looks decent. Crazy but at least decent. Please stop with the others though.
post #11 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard2Fit View Post
She looks decent. Crazy but at least decent. Please stop with the others though.
Yeah on this one only, I prefer column A.
post #12 of 40
JRoberts looks terrible in both shots. Ugh!
post #13 of 40
Heigl still looks good

my fave are the Pam Anderson ones, damn that bitch is busted
post #14 of 40
post #15 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by amerikajinda View Post
Yeah on this one only, I prefer column A.

That's what she said!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › "Natural" Girls appreciation Thread