Originally Posted by Ludeykrus
I get the tattoos, and they are in good taste, and the lower back is a nice change from the now 'traditional' tramp stamp, but what is so stunning? She's only got the two lower back pieces and the triskelion on the right arm, right?
They're simple, they are an elegant combination of the familiar (F-holes) in an unfamiliar way (a basis for art), they complement each other (curves on curves), and they instantly and clearly tell a story about her. So many tattoos are a mishmash of themes and designs. They are often complicated, lack a common theme (beyond the wearer's desires), and do not tell a story well. All of that is fine, but she chose a different path, and did it very well. Because of that, I thought they were stunning. ~ H