or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Leather Jackets: Post Pictures of the Best You've Seen/Owned?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Leather Jackets: Post Pictures of the Best You've Seen/Owned? - Page 437

post #6541 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatoneguy View Post


its actually .2"
Let's get this straight, you can't just divide cm's by 2 and get inches. It's 2.54cm=1in
I was selling some Junya jeans one time and I had all the measurements in cm. The leg opening was like 19.5cms and I cant tell you how many idiots PMd me asking how these slim jeans could have a 9" leg opening...

.4" foo.gif
post #6542 of 12797

Reading through that thread it actually looks like the results vary, from a tiny bit of shrinkage or no shrinkage to a full size or two.  Not something I'm anxious to try unless I get really stuck with the thing, though?

 

 

Quote:
also an update on my stooges: came out fantastic. was a size m, now it's definitely a size s, bordering on xs. perfect. wavy zips and all. only downside was that an old tear i had fixed opened back up - easy fix though, brought it back in and they're repairing it for no charge. can't wait to get it back in a few days.

 

Quote:
I just washed my first ever Rick leather from 07 which was just a bit too big on me and zippers are now wavy indeed.
BUT, the fit is perfect. Can't believe I waited so long to do this. Washed at 50º and then put in the dryer for an hour. Perfect. I was worried about the silk lining, but even that turned out fine. Highly recommended.

 

 

Quote:

 

pre-wash measurements:

pit to pit: 46.5 cm
length: 63 cm

 

 

anyway all in all quite happy with the outcome. leather turned out great, soft with not quite as much sheen (although I probably wouldn't recommend this for any of the heavily processed _7 leathers). jacket shrank around half a size in width although the length surprisingly didn't change at all. short of boiling the leather I think this is about the maximum shrinkage you're likely to get haha.

post-wash measurements:
pit to pit: 45 cm
length: 63 cm

 

 

 

 

Last one's via blackbird.


Edited by KingJulien - 10/5/12 at 7:45am
post #6543 of 12797
hey but you got it for cheap right so it doesn't matter i mean who cares if it doesn't fit properly
post #6544 of 12797
KJ, there's no chance you can shrink yours as much as you would need for it to look good. In order of precedence, you should:

1. Flip it for profit
2. Return it if possible
3. Sell it for marginal loss
4. Cut it up into pieces and practice your leatherworking skills
5. Give it to a homeless man on the street
6. Toss it in the garbage
...
...
...
7. Shrink it only to realize it still doesn't fit.

Sorry man. This one's a lost cause.
post #6545 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by VLSI View Post

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

KJ, there's no chance you can shrink yours as much as you would need for it to look good. In order of precedence, you should:
1. Flip it for profit
2. Return it if possible
3. Sell it for marginal loss
4. Cut it up into pieces and practice your leatherworking skills
5. Give it to a homeless man on the street
6. Toss it in the garbage
...
...
...
7. Shrink it only to realize it still doesn't fit.
Sorry man. This one's a lost cause.

 

 

Yeah no worries I came to that conclusion about three seconds after making my original post, I just think the whole idea is sorta cool so posted the info for anyone interested

post #6546 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by VLSI View Post

.4" foo.gif
are we talking about the same thing? armpit went from 53-52.5cm
edit:
nvm I see circumference now

edit2:
but still if the chest was 53cm the circumference was 166.42 and if the chest shrank to 52.5 then the circumference is 164.85. Giving 1.57 cm circumference shrink or .6" so its over half an inch. nod[1].gif
post #6547 of 12797
Dude, it's measured flat - circumference is just the p2p*2
post #6548 of 12797
nvm
post #6549 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatoneguy View Post

edit2:
but still if the chest was 53cm the circumference was 166.42 and if the chest shrank to 52.5 then the circumference is 164.85. Giving 1.57 cm circumference shrink or .6" so its over half an inch. nod[1].gif

It may be time for you to put away the calculator uhoh.gif

Think about how you take a pit to pit measurement, and it's relationship to the circumference of the piece. Unless you're suggesting that the jacket was cut for someone with a 60+" chest...

edit - Well I see you just had this cleared up smile.gif
post #6550 of 12797
shog[1].gif for some reason I was thinking it was like measuring the diameter

it's a wrap, I was wrong
post #6551 of 12797
didn't lane wash bus berger or whatever to positive results? I dunno...my skin only shrinks if I pop in the dyer after a shower. I don't recommend...
post #6552 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by BreezyBirch View Post

didn't lane wash bus berger or whatever to positive results? I dunno...my skin only shrinks if I pop in the dyer after a shower. I don't recommend...

what is new screen name of lane? i always get confused.
post #6553 of 12797
wish i never sold mine
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFX45 View Post

Oiled calf stooges is drool-worthy.
Not even sure if it's authentic, kind of wary of that zipper (looks shorter than usual) but damn I'd love to own one.
a4aoat.jpg
261gaxx.jpg
post #6554 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by artishard116 View Post

wonder if thats the one kunk was getting. same leather as my intarsia. cool texture.

i got it and plasti dipped the silver buttons black
post #6555 of 12797
Quote:
Originally Posted by thekunk07 View Post

i got it and plasti dipped the silver buttons black


Quote:
Originally Posted by DLester View Post

Whaar is fit pic of new Kunk oiled calf bauhaus?
?
?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Leather Jackets: Post Pictures of the Best You've Seen/Owned?