or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Leather Jackets: Post Pictures of the Best You've Seen/Owned?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Leather Jackets: Post Pictures of the Best You've Seen/Owned? - Page 425

post #6361 of 12857
How do Japanese boutiques survive with a model like that?
post #6362 of 12857
I was at a jean store this summer that was pretty small in size, but had literally 100's of different pairs of expensive jeans (3sixteen, flat head, PJB, samurai). There must have been well over $200,000 in clothing in such a compact area.
post #6363 of 12857
Quote:
Originally Posted by brad-t View Post

How do Japanese boutiques survive with a model like that?

 

Well, demand for clothing in Japan is MUCH higher, right?  As opposed to the USA where's it's a total oddball thing, they have fashion magazines (not the GQ kind) on every corner.

post #6364 of 12857
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post

I thought typical US apparel retail markup was between 2x and 3x (gross margin between 50% and 66% or retail price). From what you've said in the past, it sounds like the retailer in Japan typically operates on thinner margins (maybe 1x-2x multiplier?), which seems very counter-intuitive given the likely higher average cost of real estate (and labor) in Japan. So I guess the only way it could work for them is if the stores are much more productive, i.e. have much higher sales per square foot, than US retailers. Something that's not hard to believe for specialty retail - I've been to extremely "compact" stores in Japan - but is hard to comprehend for department stores - a Daimaru or Takashimaya doesn't seem much more productive than Macy's or Nordstrom at first glance.

I was referring to a FOB price there, the base minimum before any profits are added in. You're right, US retailers mark up about 3x I think, but they're also paying the brand their profits in the wholesale price. So say for ex (let's assume taxes of about 30% are built-in here). - $300 leather jacket, $600 wholesale price from a line sheet ($300 profit for the brand) - retail price of $1800 (boutique may or may not make $1200 profit. Sale price, as always, can dip to like $900 at 50% off, but if the piece lingers to a closeout of like 75% off, we're down past the wholesale price - in these cases the retail shop can even demand reparations from makers. There's a ton of reasons why the retail model is fucked.

The Japanese brands operate selling more expensive clothes at tiny markup because they have a very limited net to cast. Flagship shop, maybe a department store shop, maybe some throwaway accounts to get the product out into the countryside away from Tokyo, and then PR and staff fees - the rest they get to take home. The designer is CEO/owner usually and may even sit in his own shop, if he is so inclined. Very small, if you compare it to something like the European brands owned by equity groups and stuff.

Japanese department stores are completely different animals - they are all mostly store-in-stores operated by the brands themselves, and the brands simply pay a fee to have floor space, and lose that on those stores in exchange for more square footage across town to repeat the sales points. If the brand is foreign and not domestic, a trading company is handling a product and pays these fees, for ex Kokonoe, who handles MMM in Japan, or San Freres, who handles Raf Simons here. It's why you can buy all the brands featured in a department store at the same prices as the flagship shops in the small neighborhoods. The flagship shops are paying for real estate, the department store shops are renting floor area, in the end I think it's about the same, give or take. The department stores collect rent and sell their own food goods downstairs, they rent all the space between the basement and the top floor to brands of varying sizes, and then they rent to restaurants on the top floors. They might have a very small amount of their own trading going on clothes-wise, but not much.
post #6365 of 12857
Actually, regarding the department store's non-clothing activity - you'd be surprised at who owns what, who provides the logistics and etc for each thing sold in an Asian department store. As I said, in essence, a department store is just a large building doing micro-rentals. The food halls with produce and all that may not even be done by the dept store itself, and the restaurants usually are not. Sometimes the level of participation increases depending on the department store, but usually not. They do a good job at arranging things for their own stores. Isetan has a basement floor in the Men's wing that has a huge mixup of brands next to each other on tall cases for hundreds of feet on end - but each shoe brand sold is probably chalked up separately to each responsible brand, and those brands all chip in for staff, a little different than the boutiques upstairs. For ex, if I bought a pair of Aldens and a pair of Crockett and Jones at Isetan - they're sold not 5 foot from each other in the same room, with no more differentiation than a single small 4" placard for each brand display - but when ringing them up the store computers would split the sales to their respective companies.
And that is exactly how these Asian department stores are able to bring in huge names that attract people - they're merely renting real estate. Takashimaya in Shinjuku has Kinokuniya bookstore, they have brand name restaurants that have original traditional outposts elsewhere, they have a bunch of assorted fashion brands - department stores are just real estate shells that operate as bazaars and markets. It's why all of those department store companies are able to participate in a variety of businesses apart from the department store business- there's not much they're doing there besides the rent-collecting. There's still a bunch of holy executive positions way up there just like in the west, but honestly the messy free-for-all logistics probably make for easier work on the department store side, as well as the small retailer's side.
post #6366 of 12857
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFX45 View Post

Lamb 5-zip, I know it's practically the same jacket in different pics but this one is lamb and looks much thinner but cost $600+ more.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

16lwbr6.jpg

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

2j42b2f.jpg
x5sivb.jpg
I think I'll probably pull the trigger on the bovine version this weekend, hopefully the store still has the 34 and 36 this weekend so I can try both on.

 

 

The finish of the lamb on that is interesting, from the pictures, it doesn't really strike me as leather.  Interesting to see it in person, as it has this matte finish.  

 

I think ssense sells that model, the only thing that I'm not keen on is that it looks like the zippers have this blue outline around them.  You can see if you zoom in

 

post #6367 of 12857
^ ^ ^
Yup, that is the exact jacket. I noticed that SSense pic just makes the jacket look more matte navy than black, not just the sides of the zippers. I think it's their photography, I noticed other black clothes/leathers in their website in the past where it looked blue-ish than black.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bob99 View Post

I used to be head over heels for the 5-zip, but I'm not feeling it with the sliver zippers. I love the thinness of the lamb leather, but I feel like it would look much better without the two diagonal zips. Of course, then it wouldn't be a 5-zip (literally) so I obviously don't know what I'm talking about.

The SA in the store actually said the zippers are more gunmetal-ish than silver on the Bovine. Perhaps the zippers on the lamb is more silver?
2hmddsw.jpg


I'm usually a fan of blacked out things but the 5-zip isn't something that I was keen on.
2yuj213.jpg
post #6368 of 12857
I'm about to buy an Intarsia from SS10 in XS.
Seller says pit-to-pit is 42cm (=16.5 inch) and 41cm shoulders (=16.14 inch).
Is that even possible?
Shouldn't pit to pit be around 44 - 45cm?
post #6369 of 12857
Quote:
Originally Posted by filcol View Post

I'm about to buy an Intarsia from SS10 in XS.
Seller says pit-to-pit is 42cm (=16.5 inch) and 41cm shoulders (=16.14 inch).
Is that even possible?
Shouldn't pit to pit be around 44 - 45cm?

Yes!
post #6370 of 12857
i would guess its more like 17 but yeah, starting around ss10 sizing is real small. I'm a xs/s and had to buy a 48 in this years intarsia.
post #6371 of 12857
Well if Beijing does a bond attack on Japan, clothes will be cheap...
post #6372 of 12857
Just saw it isn't an intarsia. I don't know that model, can someone tell me the name?

post #6373 of 12857
I just call that one "moto".
post #6374 of 12857
And do you have any idea if the measurements are correct? I can't find anyone else offering this jacket to check the measurements frown.gif
post #6375 of 12857
I do have the exact same jacket in xs but I am not sure what season mine is to be honest and ROs sizing is very inconsistent with the sizing from season to season. I think you're just going to have to trust the sellers measurements, I'd say mine is ~17"-17.5" in the chest but could be about 16.5" as well, it's really not that far fetch in a size xs.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Leather Jackets: Post Pictures of the Best You've Seen/Owned?