• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The End of 1960's Architecture.

MCsommerreid

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Maybe that'll spread to California and they'll de-institutionalize my school. Damn thing looks like a prison half the time, very similar in construction to the BART stations, which are hellishly Brutalist.
 

robin

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
12,378
Reaction score
161
I will miss the starkness of those buildings, but does this mean we have to wait 40 more years until we can tear down buildings by Koolhaas, Gehry, et. al?
 

Bradford

Current Events Moderator
Joined
Mar 19, 2002
Messages
6,626
Reaction score
228
While I appreciate that we are finally moving beyond the 1960's institutional aesthetic, you do realize that the referenced article is 4-years old?
 

robin

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
12,378
Reaction score
161
Originally Posted by Bradford
While I appreciate that we are finally moving beyond the 1960's institutional aesthetic, you do realize that the referenced article is 4-years old?
Constantinople exists in the past, present, and future.
 

andyw

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
917
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by Bradford
While I appreciate that we are finally moving beyond the 1960's institutional aesthetic, you do realize that the referenced article is 4-years old?

Here's a relavant article from this Saturdays NY Times on a Paul Rudolph designed High School circa 1958 facing demolition. Interesting that the buiulding is described as being green and suggests a humanistic quality. The local community and parents are in support of restoring and upgrading the buiulding, but the administration not.

Ironic timing no?!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/21/ar...21+2008&st=nyt
 

Nataku

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
9,833
Reaction score
27,416
I think this issue is pretty much the same as it was in the 60's when everyone hated Victorian architecture and they tore the houses and buildings down left and right. One building in Minneapolis known as the Metropolitain building had no business being torn down. It was perfectly functional and had no problems. There were even businesses still occupying the spaces inside the building a couple weeks before demolition. It was demolished simply because people thought it was "outdated" and they were all for "urban renewal". I'm a member of the Minnesota Perservation Society and it literally brings tears to our eyes when we see what they've ruined. 40 years from now, I feel we will regret erasing much of the modernist architecture of the 50's and 60's as well. People never seem to learn.....
 

LabelKing

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
May 24, 2002
Messages
25,421
Reaction score
268
Nataku, that is exactly the point. Look at the late Penn Station--at the time, it was only being supported for preservation by a few people, albeit some influential ones, and even that didn't save it.
jane.jpg
181297126_8307a20325.jpg
 

Nataku

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
9,833
Reaction score
27,416
It's a sad thing. Many forms of fairly modern (post 1800) architecture are almost completely erased. Look at the Mansard-style buildings and homes for example. They were beautiful, yet only a very distinct few survive. Another is gothic style farm houses - nobody seems to want to save those either. All are a huge part of our history and would be really nice if someone put some effort into restoring them.......
 

yachtie

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
4,455
Reaction score
26
After seeing so many beautiful structures torn down to be replaced by '60 monstrosities, I'm glad their turn has come.

van der Rohe should have been institutionalized.

Now this was an awesome space:

181297126_8307a20325.jpg
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,486
Messages
10,589,880
Members
224,252
Latest member
ColoradoLawyer
Top