smw356
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2006
- Messages
- 486
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh really? so is he some Alien-human hybrid or animal-human hybrid.
aren't all imaginauts?
We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Oh really? so is he some Alien-human hybrid or animal-human hybrid.
What is your evidence Ronnie are on those things? If not, you are doing a great disservice to the sport, the man, his hardwork and his legion of fans.
What kind of fucked up logic is that?
So Ronnie is a different species from his competitors now?
So Ronnie is a different species from his competitors now?
The argument of lunges making Ronnie Coleman a winner is about as faulty as saying saying eating big meals of pasta isn't bad for you because Italians have the lowest BMI (or cheetahs run fast because they hunt gazelles); the causality simply isn't there.
Saucemaster;962785 said:It's comforting to know that we can always count on beasty to teach us what is true bodybuilding that works and is aesthetically pleasing not unlike Michaelangelo's work on the Sistine Chapel and make a lucid, cogent, precise and outstanding argument in awe-inspiring fashion.
/QUOTE]
Thanks for the compliment.
It's comforting to know that we can always count on you to make sweeping statements and be utterly clueless awe-inspiringly.
Do you realize that you actually REITERATED why's point in the guise of disagreeing with him? You attributed a view to him that was the exact OPPOSITE of what he said.
My post in rebuttal by presenting a point in direct opposition to his exposes how wrong he is. Anyone with a bare modicum of intelligence would have caught on to it and marvel at my witty retort and utter demolition of why just like all bodybuilders marvel at the size and muscle density of Jay and how he demolishes the weights in the gym and rival competitors.
The argument of lunges making Ronnie Coleman a winner is about as faulty as saying saying eating big meals of pasta isn't bad for you because Italians have the lowest BMI (or cheetahs run fast because they hunt gazelles); the causality simply isn't there.
There has to be something that makes Ronnie better than his competitors, right?Even if true, it's highly likely that his competitors were also on HGH, test, and roids, yet Ronnie still managed to win 8 consecutive Mr. Olympias, meaning that Ronnie does something better than everyone else (or has better genetics than everyone else)
There has to be something that makes Ronnie better than his competitors, right?
Yeah...so what's your point? That's like saying the team that scores the most points in football will win.
Keep on knocking down strawmen there...