Originally Posted by beasty
My post in rebuttal by presenting a point in direct opposition to his exposes how wrong he is. Anyone with a bare modicum of intelligence would have caught on to it and marvel at my witty retort and utter demolition of why just like all bodybuilders marvel at the size and muscle density of Jay and how he demolishes the weights in the gym and rival competitors.
My God man, you really are dense.
Let's break it down for you.
Why says, "You said (X). That logic is flawed."
You say, "I never said X! What if I were to say (Y) [the reader will note that Y shares the exact same logical flaws as X]? That's flawed logic!"
In other words, you just AGREED with why. All in the guise of disagreeing with him. Yes, reiterating and agreeing with my opponent, and even providing him with alternate examples of the exact point he was making in the first place, surely constitutes an impressive rebuttal!
Seriously, stop for a second, READ what why wrote and what you wrote, then think. I know it hurts, but try it anyway. Would Jay give up on his last set of squats just because it hurt? NO! So be an imaginaut and push through it. Soon, you will see the error of your ways.