Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Fine Living, Home, Design & Auto › Canon's various PowerShot models: any opinions or recs between them?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Canon's various PowerShot models: any opinions or recs between them?

post #1 of 29
3/2/08 at 1:33am
Thread Starter 
I'm looking for a new point-and-shoot digital camera in the $300 neighborhood, and I've pretty much narrowed it down to a Canon. There's the SD850 (Cnet's fav), the SD700 (same thing sans viewfinder), the SD1000 (pc mag's fav, and the purdiest IMO) and the brand new SD1100.

Does anybody know enough about these, relative to one another, to be able to give me some input?
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 29
3/2/08 at 2:36am
Joel, our last two cameras were PowerShots. We wanted a new camera for a trip last fall and my wife did all her usual methodical research and came up with a Sony this time. If you're interested in looking into it, I'll go dig up the model.
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 29
3/2/08 at 3:04am
Thread Starter 
The Sony CyberShot DSC T300 was a semi-finalist. The online reviews seemed to criticize it for having "noisy and soft" pictures though, which was a turn-off. I'll be using it for vacations and weddings and all that common pocket-camera stuff, but my real day-to-day usage will most likely be for the Buying & Selling forum here, so getting faithful shots of different fabrics etc is really more primary than other bells and whistles. From what I gather, Canon is the way to go for picture quality in this price range.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 29
3/2/08 at 3:21am
the sd870 is nice
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 29
3/2/08 at 3:26am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghulkhan View Post
the sd870 is nice

aww crap. I didn't even know that one existed. You (and google) have just narrowed my 4 contenders down to 5
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 29
3/2/08 at 4:22am
I say you go for the SD 850/870 they both have 4x optical zoom and Optical Image stabilization making them the winrar of this battle.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 29
3/2/08 at 3:52pm
i've had the sd1000 since early november and i say definitely the sd870. the main difference between the camera's you're looking at is whether or not they have optical image stabilization and their focal length on the wide end. the 870 is the only one that gives you 28mm equivalent on the wide end, and for $300, it's a bargain. i'm pretty sure it cost about $450 when i was shopping around in november. i cannot stress this enough: wider is better. i agree the sd1000 is the best looking, but it lacks o.i.s. and that's a big deal. it's almost useless above i.s.o. 400, as i suspect all these cameras are, so the o.i.s. will make a big difference. also, if you can find the sd800 at a significant discount, you might want to get that one. it's essentially the same camera as the 870, with 7mp instead of 8.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 29
3/2/08 at 7:21pm
Yeah, compared to the other models, the SD1000 is fairly entry-level, and basic
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 29
3/2/08 at 10:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by matadorpoeta View Post
the main difference between the camera's you're looking at is whether or not they have optical image stabilization and their focal length on the wide end. the 870 is the only one that gives you 28mm equivalent on the wide end, and for $300, it's a bargain. i'm pretty sure it cost about $450 when i was shopping around in november. i cannot stress this enough: wider is better.

+1. I have the SD800IS, the predecessor of the 870, and its 28 mm wide end is the main reason I got it. It's a more versatile camera because of it.

--Andre
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 29
3/3/08 at 12:38pm
OK, I may betray my total photography ignorance here, but, besides looks, what's the $160 difference between the SD870 and something from the A series, like the A570? Just curious.
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 29
3/3/08 at 12:43pm
Thread Starter 
so the 870 sounds good, but I am put-off by the lack of a viewfinder, which I find I actually use quite a bit... anybody know how wide the 850 goes?
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 29
3/3/08 at 12:54pm
A630 is badass if you can find it in your price range.
You can add other lenses as well. It is kind of like a point and shoot +

I have the SD750, which I like, but can not hold a flame to the A series.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerSho...4559695&sr=1-1


The SD series is nice, but has sacrificed performance for small size and style IMO.
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 29
3/3/08 at 2:26pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel_Cairo View Post
so the 870 sounds good, but I am put-off by the lack of a viewfinder, which I find I actually use quite a bit... anybody know how wide the 850 goes?

the 850 goes to 35 or 36mm (equivalent.)

i should have mentioned that my previous p&s was the canon a95, and it was excellent. the a series are good cameras, but the drawback is they are not pocketable, and you're very unlikely to have it with you all the time. if you don't find it necessary to have a camera with you at all times, you may want to consider an a series with o.i.s. also, because they are larger, it's much easier to hold them steady.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 29
3/3/08 at 2:30pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoreman1782 View Post
OK, I may betray my total photography ignorance here, but, besides looks, what's the $160 difference between the SD870 and something from the A series, like the A570? Just curious.
it's not small enough to fit in your pocket, and it only goes down to 35, not 28.
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 29
3/3/08 at 6:03pm
I have an A620 and it's okay but the lens is not what you would get with a DSLR. A good value though.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Fine Living, Home, Design & Auto › Canon's various PowerShot models: any opinions or recs between them?