or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Unfunded Liabilities: a/k/a The Cloth Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Unfunded Liabilities: a/k/a The Cloth Thread - Page 268

post #4006 of 10669
Pretty limited context don't you think?
post #4007 of 10669
Quote:
Originally Posted by whnay. View Post

Pretty limited context don't you think?

Maybe? Depends on your tastes and lifestyle I guess. There's an evening following every summer day. If you never wear tailored clothing at night, then there's little point. But if you wear tailored clothing every evening, you've got just as much use for a summer evening jacket as any other summer jacket.

In general jackets for the daytime look much less out of place at night than vice versa, if only because people go out after work without time to change quite frequently, and it's much better to be dressed appropriately for work and "inappropriately" for going out later than the other way around. But still, a peak lapeled mohair blend jacket would look quite nice in the evening, and an improvement over the 520 fresco jacket I think.

I wouldn't recommend such a jacket as someone's second or third odd jacket. But if they already have a diverse wardrobe of a dozen or so? It merits consideration. I have a peak-lapeled single button velvet jacket - I wear it only in the evening of course, but it gets plenty of use, and I'm happy to wear something in the evening that isn't officewear.
post #4008 of 10669
Outside of odd dinner jackets (velvet, tartan, etc), I hate the idea of a peak lapeled odd jacket...but that's just me.
post #4009 of 10669
Quote:
Originally Posted by whnay. View Post

Outside of odd dinner jackets (velvet, tartan, etc), I hate the idea of a peak lapeled odd jacket...but that's just me.

It's an understandable position to take. Currently I have an irrational desire for a peak-lapeled odd jacket in the LL oats linen. I may come to regret it, but I think at this point I am decided on it.
post #4010 of 10669
Quote:
Originally Posted by whnay. View Post

Outside of odd dinner jackets (velvet, tartan, etc), I hate the idea of a peak lapeled odd jacket...but that's just me.

Also, I assume you're speaking only of single-breasted jackets? Unless you dislike all double-breasted odd jackets as well?
post #4011 of 10669
Just single breasted, although a double breasted tweed coat generally looks odd....
post #4012 of 10669
Quote:
Originally Posted by whnay. View Post

Just single breasted, although a double breasted tweed coat generally looks odd....

As an odd jacket, I agree. A double-breasted tweed overcoat however....icon_gu_b_slayer[1].gif
post #4013 of 10669
Agreed, would be good - although I think I'm partial to a good ole fashion polo coat
post #4014 of 10669
Quote:
Originally Posted by whnay. View Post

Agreed, would be good - although I think I'm partial to a good ole fashion polo coat

Agreed, it's hard to improve upon. My next overcoat will certainly be a camel hair polo coat. Incidentally, I came across this article recently, I hope it's not uncouth to post it here:

http://kaufmann-mercantile.com/camel-hair-coat/
post #4015 of 10669
A polo coat is also high on my list. I have a navy Guard's coat right now that I wear in heavy winters, but also want a tweed Ulster. The ones I saw at Panico's workshop were really incredible.
post #4016 of 10669
At this point, what's the difference between a polo coat and an ulster coat? At the very least it seems like many overcoats could be described as both?
post #4017 of 10669
I think the world of men's coats is very poorly defined. There are many types of polo coats, but if we were to go with the one most people understand, that golden tan camel hair fabric is a requirement, but the Ulster collar less so. I've seen peak lapeled polo coats, for example, still be referred to as polos. On the other hand, an Ulster coat needs an Ulster collar, but can be made from a wider variety of materials.

We should start a thread titled something like "In Celebration of Men's Dress Coats." Or something like that. I don't know if one has already been created, but having a special thread dedicated to talking about dress coats might be worthwhile. Maybe I start one?
post #4018 of 10669
The Polo has a wide, flat shoulder, envelope pockets and turnback cuffs and (sometimes) a half belt. It's also typically in camel hair and cut looser.

The Ulster is essentialy a double-breasted chesterfield, with the sweeping / curved peak lapels, and always with a half belt.

In short, they're very similar except for the cut and shoulder.

Polo:






Ulster:



post #4019 of 10669
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieworkwear View Post

I think the world of men's coats is very poorly defined. There are many types of polo coats, but if we were to go with the one most people understand, that golden tan camel hair fabric is a requirement, but the Ulster collar less so. I've seen peak lapeled polo coats, for example, still be referred to as polos. On the other hand, an Ulster coat needs an Ulster collar, but can be made from a wider variety of materials.
We should start a thread titled something like "In Celebration of Men's Dress Coats." Or something like that. I don't know if one has already been created, but having a special thread dedicated to talking about dress coats might be worthwhile. Maybe I start one?

Yes, please do. I just spent a large amount of time reviewing what has been posted and the closest to a comprehensive thread is one started by Manton when he was looking to make one up. I also fruitlessly spent hours trying to find a pic of a Rubinacci that Isillismatt had made. I just ordered one last week and may be willing to post my first pic.

Rob
post #4020 of 10669
Thread Starter 
I think a polo has peak (upturned) lapels. That's the way I always see them.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Unfunded Liabilities: a/k/a The Cloth Thread