Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artisan Fan 
H,
This is a very general statement that will not hold. How do you know the ear cannot detect a particular audio event? You would be surprised how small changes in the playback chain of a highly resolving stereo system can matter.
Look at CD players for instance, at one point scientists felt that digital timing differences in the data stream were trivial. Over time, engineers like Julian Dunn discovered that nanosecond (!) timing differences were readily detectable. Now experts I talk to believe that picosecond differences can be heard. The human ear is an amazing instrument.
General statements rarely hold, and that's the point of them. Though that was the least substantive and most general thing I've said in this thread, it's the only one to be jumped upon, even though I was merely displaying the wider canvas.
My sister has super-hearing, in some frequencies she can hear down to 0dB. It really disturbed her ENT. So you can believe I know the resolving power of the human ear is staggering.
I believe that there are aspects we don't understand and are not aware of.
I believe that there are a host of factors that improve/contribute to high quality audio that are well understood.
I believe that on occasion certain improvements in the audiophile world make a difference that cannot be easily understood/ cannot easily be detected by a panel of listeners (Just as I know you can detect differences in vodka, when many claim they cannot).
I believe that others may take advantage of a technical gap to claim improvements that do not exist, or to cite real improvements to non-physical phenomenon.
The darkfield elevators fall into that last class. Perhaps raising speaker wires does improve the sound, I don't know. I
do know that the reasoning for the claims made on that website are massively specious. The language is overblown and sounds good to non-technical people, but physicists laugh at it.