Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fatlark 
So I should still opt to size down one?
I looked into N&F measurements extensively but never pulled the trigger. I received both good information and bad, so I'll try to pass on the good bits and sway you from the foibles.
As far as I know, this chart from Tate & Yoko is accurate. It was verified to me by several users with experience with this brand.
| TAG SIZE |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
34 |
36 |
| WAIST |
30 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
34 |
35 |
36 |
38 |
| FRONT RISE |
10 |
10.25 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.75 |
11 |
11.25 |
| UPPER THIGH |
11 |
11.25 |
11.5 |
11.75 |
12 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.75 |
| KNEE |
8 |
8.1 |
8.3 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
9 |
9.25 |
9.5 |
| LEG OPENING |
7 |
7.1 |
7.25 |
7.5 |
7.75 |
8 |
8.25 |
8.5 |
| INSEAM |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
Weird Guys are already vanity sized by 2, and much of the advice out there fails to clarify if you're sizing down from your tag size or the actual waist measurement. Those 31s you tried on should have been 33" out of the box. If they fit you perfectly, I assume that 33" is your ideal pants size. If you want these pants to land on 33, you should order a 30 to account for an inch of stretch.
But that's assuming that the waist is your primary concern. If you even lift, you must consider the thigh measurement. That's going to get pretty tight, if it isn't already, and the thighs don't stretch as much. You might want to stick with the 31s and rationalize that inevitable inch+ of stretch as bulking clearance in order to maximize the upper thigh.
Remember, I don't own a pair of Naked & Famous. I've just done so much research that I'll randomly answer a question from time to time. Please regard me with skepticism, for all our sakes.