Originally Posted by otc
Wait, are people really arguing that he's not sexist because his favored form of attack on male rivals is to insult their manliness? Thereby implying they are more like women? The subtext being that manly men=good, women=bad?
I'm disagreeing with the thought he attacks women for being women but attacks men as people.
Also, I don't think that subtext claim quite fits. It's more like, "Manly men make better leaders" which may or may not be correct. Also, it does not follow from there that "women = bad."
Also, fuck you all for putting me in the position where I have to unravel this.