I'm going to give this one more try before assuming that this is just a troll.
a) you're conflating recognition of non-western aesthetics with some extreme kind of relativism
b) you fail to distinguish between any of the large varieties of philosophical relativism, lumping them altogether into one incoherent heap (you don't distinguish between cultural relativism, conceptual relativism, aesthetic relativism, moral relativism, strong vs. weak relativism—see http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/ for more reading)
c) you're drawing a false similarity between two completely different fits/photos
d) your assertion that western values "reflect" what is naturally beautiful is unqualified—you provide no argument for this other than that it's "self-evident" (which is clearly is not). you can have all of the assumptions you want, but unless you provide an argument for them nobody will listen to you.