Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChicagoRon 
I've read/heard from a number of sources that Full HD (1080p) is not at all worth the money. In terms of being "future proof", the only technology in the 3 year horizon that will be full 1080p is Blue Ray. No broadcast/cable plans in the works at all, and cost would probably be prohibitive in the lifespan of a TV purchased today.
I've even read reviews that had control tests where a the split of 10 viewers of blue ray discs on 1080p and 720p Tv's was split 60/40 or 50/50 where most people either could not tell the difference or in one case the majority chose the 720p set.
Furthermore, the price difference is not as small as you think because 1080i/720p Plasmas that came out in Q207 are now available at deep discount because the 1080p models have replaced them.
I'm probably making a purchase in the next few days, and for the money, I'm seriously considering the Pioneer 720p model (PDP-5080p) or the Panisonic TH-50PH10UK.
Any concrete evidence/published opinions that might change my mind?
I spent the weekend looking at TVs - everything from 40" 720p to 52" 1080p Plasma - and pulled the trigger today on the Samsung LNT 4671F.
I wanted really good resolution with the 1080p and I wanted the 120 hz because I watch a lot of sports. Also, with the price that Amazon had (no tax and free shipping and 36% off of list, which is below the Best Buy cost), I went with it.
I buy a new TV every 7 years, I figured a little more money, about 500 bucks from the lower priced Samsung, was worth it. I liken it to a fused suit vs a canvassed one, which would you want?