or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2016 - News, Pictures, Sizing, Accessories, Clothing, etc
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2016 - News, Pictures, Sizing, Accessories, Clothing, etc - Page 38

post #556 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by redmusic1 View Post


Though it says "suede" in the color description, the full description indicates hardier and more durable nubuck. I'm curious to see how these "fit and weather like no other boat shoe."

Ah, had to go educate myself on the differences. Interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by danwatts2005 View Post

I kind of like the look of those, but I'd rather see a Kirkwood model. I'm not going to drop $300 on a Dominican boat shoe.

Wait for the inevitable clearance sale in the fall? biggrin.gif
post #557 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by danwatts2005 View Post


I kind of like the look of those, but I'd rather see a Kirkwood model. I'm not going to drop $300 on a Dominican boat shoe.

 

I wouldn't drop $175 which is what my screen says. But, if they would give an introductory price like they did with the campmocs, I might consider them. I'm hoping someone else can give evidence on how they weather and I can pick them up out of season. These are far more up my ally than the CXL, seeing as how I am near a body of water about once a year. 

post #558 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by danwatts2005 View Post


I kind of like the look of those, but I'd rather see a Kirkwood model. I'm not going to drop $300 on a Dominican boat shoe.


Agreed. I love suede/nubuck, and I love the casual look. I'd much rather see a kirkwood model. But even so, $300 for a casual/sockless shoe is far too much.

post #559 of 17616

Was almost 60 in Charlotte today and you guys have given me loafer fever, so I busted out the Fryes.  Now I can't stop thinking about adding a loafer for the spring and damn I want a Lake Forest!  Also, I think I do like the look of the Ascher and it's on clearance right now, but I never see this shoe discussed on here.  I guess most of you guys really aren't down with loafers, but I'd be interested to get some feedback if anyone owns a pair.

 

Also, damnit those brown Kirkwoods look awesome.  I picked up a blue pair back in July, but my typical AE 11D size just was just too narrow around my big toe on that shoe.  I have a pair of red Maritimes (I went to a college with red and white colors) in 11.5 D and they are a tad long.  I'm going to try the 11E on the Kirkwoods next time and snag a pair when they go on sale.

post #560 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc808314 View Post

@middlepP , do you find the Clark Street fits similar to other 108 lasted shoes in calf leather? I really like the tans, but I am afraid that the toebox is going to be too tight.

 

What other 108s do you have? 

 

I have tried on a handful (Clifton, Mora, Vernon all in 9d), but own just one other 108 - the Carlyle in 9E (purchased nwob off ebay). What I know now, 9D might be better, at least in terms of volume of the vamp. Hard to compare 9E to 9D along with bal vs blu and calf vs cxl, but I would say the Carlyles are noticeable wider. The open lacing and the CXL of the Clark Street provide a good amount of give. I usually wear them with no show socks, but wore them today with medium weight and was pleasantly surprised with the fit.

post #561 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc808314 View Post

Nice. Mine are on their way. Couldn't pass them for $57.

 

Agreed. I know they are not recraftable, but $57 is an absolute steal.

post #562 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexnb View Post


Agreed. I love suede/nubuck, and I love the casual look. I'd much rather see a kirkwood model. But even so, $300 for a casual/sockless shoe is far too much.

I haven't asked, but I'm sure if I did, AE would recommend the Sea Island as a Kirkwood model. That's what I was referring to. Beautiful shoe, but not $300 beautiful.
post #563 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCRich View Post
 

Unrelated, I'm attempting to break in my Dalton's.  Aside from wearing them around the house for a bit at a time, any inside tips?  These are my favorite shoes I own and I haven't been able to wear them outside the house yet haha.

 

I always hit my new boots with a couple coats of Bick 4 - inside and out. Then I wear with slightly heavier socks for the first wear or two. After that they are usually good to go. My Daltons are still breaking in, but that has more to do with my big toes hugging the edge.

post #564 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCRich View Post
 

 

Unrelated, I'm attempting to break in my Dalton's.  Aside from wearing them around the house for a bit at a time, any inside tips?  These are my favorite shoes I own and I haven't been able to wear them outside the house yet haha.

 

Mine were pretty good from the start, but a little conditioning on the gusset to help the tongue sit right sure did help.  I second the hitting of the inside with some Bick 4, Lexol or AE conditioner, if you're having a hard time.

post #565 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by danwatts2005 View Post


I haven't asked, but I'm sure if I did, AE would recommend the Sea Island as a Kirkwood model. That's what I was referring to. Beautiful shoe, but not $300 beautiful.

 

Now I think I see what you were saying. There is a big difference between a kirkwood type boat shoe with a rubber sole and nubuck uppers, and the leather soled sea island in suede from Charles F. Stead. Two completely different animals and price ranges. The Sea Island is more like a seasonal beef role Cavanaugh with better suede. 

post #566 of 17616

With all the recent loafer talk, I want to bring these back up.  Saw these, and REALLY like them, but they had no name, and I haven't been able to find out any info on them.  They may have been a MTO.  Possibly a production sample??

 


Anyone have a model name?  or thoughts on these?

post #567 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace13x View Post

With all the recent loafer talk, I want to bring these back up.  Saw these, and REALLY like them, but they had no name, and I haven't been able to find out any info on them.  They may have been a MTO.  Possibly a production sample??







Anyone have a model name?  or thoughts on these?

Never seen them before. I can dig them. Do you like them? If the price is good. Go for it.
post #568 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattRiv View Post


Never seen them before. I can dig them. Do you like them? If the price is good. Go for it.


Would have, but I could fit 2 fingers behind my heels on those.  I'm kicking myself for not getting the numbers from the inside, but thats when I got my Chocolate Daltons for $55, and I wasn't thinking clearly.

post #569 of 17616

What do you all do to maintain Strandmoks? Specifically blue if it makes a difference.

 

AE says Leather Lotion. Anything else? Or just that.

post #570 of 17616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace13x View Post


Would have, but I could fit 2 fingers behind my heels on those.  I'm kicking myself for not getting the numbers from the inside, but thats when I got my Chocolate Daltons for $55, and I wasn't thinking clearly.

Where in the hell were you???
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2016 - News, Pictures, Sizing, Accessories, Clothing, etc