Quote:
In editing my post, you edited out the link. Here it is again. www.banda.com
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
I am surprised that Roman numerals would be considered a paux pas on a "true" dress watch. You certainly see a lot of vintage dress watches from all makers which fit the bill for the sort of specs you demand of a true dress watch. Here is a typical example from Girard-Perregaux:
However, not a single current model from the offerings of A. Lange & Soehne, Patek Philippe, Girard Perregaux fit the bill to name just a few makers whose current offerings I have looked up. Even the Senator (not the Senator Sixties) from Glashuette Original really fails to fit the bill as it is oversized by classical standards at 40mm x 10mm. Traditionally anything 38mm and over was considered "oversized". I get the feeling that this reflects the way the buyers of fine watches are generally dressing. The watch market in general is aimed at wearers of casual dress and sportswear, with the marketing by Rolex leading the way. Watchmakers no longer seem to strive to make the sort of sleek and elegant dress watch as they used to. Classical vintage dress watches all measure about 33-36mm in diameter and makers competed to try to make them as thin as possible. The above Girard Perregaux vintage watch is 34.5mm in diameter.
