Diplomats give up adopted child after having their own - Page 3

Someone call Angilna Jolie!!!!!!!!!!

Angelina can adopt me anytime

me too


But this is really fucked up..

sorry for my religious rhetoric, but this story enrages me.

just letting you know , one of the primary purposes of our lives is to love others, especially children, and from God's own words, orphans.

if you dont want to help children , that is fine , your choice, but to use them as commodities, to abuse them and to destroy their lives WILL make you face judgment.
im sorry to say this, but that couple deserves judgement.

Mark, your sister is awesome.

I feel bad for their own biological kids as well. They seem like very in-genuine parents using kids for an ulterior reasons pertaining to themselves as Shoe said...

There are lots of ways in which this is fucked up, but what I dont get is how an adoption of a 4 month old baby can 'not work out'. OK, so pick on Mark's sister (sorry dude, she is clearly an amazing woman), but she has taken in an 11 yr old with wired-in issues. I can see how this could 'not work out'....and fwiw I truly hope it works out wonderfully for all them. But with a 4 month old - that kid is a blank slate. Whatever it is that they apparently didnt like about the kid, they put there themselves as parents. What will they do if they 'program' their biological kids to be little shits, and dislike them when they get to be bratty 7 yr olds?

i dont understand 'doesn't work out' , WTF?? (I have to use that strong language).
Like a car? a computer?
Fucking give the children unconditional love. PERIOD.

Im sorry.


Sad thing is this is kind of thing is going on and worse tragedies to children all over.
Innocent 7 year olds molested sexually and then buried ALIVE.

Im not joking.
I wish i was GOD sometimes. Nothing gets me angrier than thoughts of these.

Unless there is something we're not being told (like the kid is seriously mentally disturbed, possessed by the devil, a danger to the other children) then this is pretty low and reprehensible.

Warms my heart.

This is the part of the equation that's been ignored. I don't know how old the biological children are, so this might not be an issue, but can you imagine how the scumbag parents explained to the kids the disappearance of their sister? And what would that do to them? "Mommy and Daddy gave back our sister because _____. What happens if *I* do something bad/disappoint them/etc.?"

And as m@T said, how messed up can a four-month-old really be, and how can it take 7 years to realize? I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that this was the father's idea: once he could have his own kids the adopted one became an accessory.

maybe they'll get Mendezed

http://www.courttv.com/trials/menendez/

I can take care of this situation. Anyone has a phone number for Woody Allen?

The rhetorics going here is awesome.

I mean, come on, we all know that if given a choice in adoption, the choice of "color" would be white over any shades of colors, probably along the line of white > pale asian > darker asian > black. This is especially true in the US, and I'm sure not too far from the truth elsewhere.

Yes, I'm in agreement that the situation is less than desirable, and quite f*ucked up, but human beings will do what please them the most. And if that means giving back a "yellow" Asian kid when one's desire for a presumably "white" baby is fulfilled, than so be it.

Look at it this way, imagine the shabby treatments this 7 year old Korean girl will get in the hands of these diplomats if they had kept her, knowing full well she's less than desirable and only fulfilling a temporary need for a child until the right one comes along.

fuck those scumbags

I think everyone recognizes this, and I certainly wouldn't advocate forcing the parents to keep the girl--far from it. The outrage at the parents' feelings of disposability w/r/t a "wanted" child--and probably the perceived effects of that attitude on parenting the biological children--is what animates the rhetoric.