you still try to discredit everything he and i say regarding eugene despite having overwhelming evidence otherwise from not only us, but also other parties. you say i'm running a smear campaign against eugene. it's only a smear campaign if he is, in fact, innocent. i don't think you even know what a strawman argument is. regardless, it's clear you only see what you want to see and don't consider other possibilities. also, i'm just going to point out that all your arguments have been based on logical fallacies even though you accuse that of us. hopefully one day you'll realize this and grow from it. you work on hearsay, perfect coincidences, and lack of evidence to justify your arguments. i work with facts. one holds significantly more weight than the other. thanks for your time.
if you want to throw another red herring to try to direct the attention away from the scam and towards purported errors in logic, feel free to do so.
Edited by nahneun - 7/27/16 at 1:25pm