Take all of the guns. All of them. - Page 54
They were clearly planning some sort of attack and I'd suspect the motive was religious, although they haven't declared that yet. Whether or not the original plan was to attack the Christmas party remains unknown. I'm sure the dipshit is rushing to the lectern to tell us that "Muslims armed with rifles is a scenario that just doesn't happen in other countries."
No references to Christmas allowed in the People's Republic of Kalifornia.
If you want insane hypothesis, you gotta go all the way:
1) Syed Farook is probably along with his brother an MD in training or resident , given the preponderance of brown/muslim doctors in the US
2) Doctors have been wanting federal funds for gun violence research for some time
4) Syed Farook and co. were agents sent by this 2000-strong sleeper cell on the day the demands were made for more funding
5) Academia, Democrats, and Thoughtcrime
Well, they do overlap somewhat you know. Hard to shoot up a place with no guns.
the conclusion from this post is that even if gun restriction/prohibition is in effect, as it was in Paris, nutjobs will find ways to commit horrible atrocities
what if Alex Jones has us all beat. Potential false flag op ???
Everyone believes that a massive deportation initiative would inevitably result in some kind of resistance from people who wouldn't want to leave the country. That analysis is probably correct. With 300+ million guns in the country, a confiscation of all privately owned firearms would be needed in order to make an impact on the number of guns in circulation. If the left thinks we would see resistance and bloodshed over deportation, they have no idea what a confiscation program would lead to. It wouldn't be pretty, and if they were stupid enough to try it I suspect the small percentage of LE they convinced to be involved would have second thoughts very quickly (so would the politicians). And as you rightly pointed out, tongue in cheek or not, Paris is a perfect example of gun control failing to prevent terrorist attacks. This doesn't even begin to consider that several attacks used explosive devices, not guns.
It's really hard to draw a meaningful conclusion from this post. Maybe we need to examine the role of black SUVs?
It's not that I'm against rational gun control but you've really undermined the impetus here by tossing in the Paris tragedy.
seems more likely that that was the target all along, and the guy picked a fight himself to get his blood going so he could go through with the thing. the gopro footage may clarify that
btw, how crappy is that ad space? i feel like media go out of their way to brand these events, they never say "personal video device" or anything like that, it's always "brought to you by gopro"