LOL, every post just completes the image of you being a 12-year-old in a man's body. You dismissed the main summary of the study, and then claimed I did. WTF, are you seriously this fucking stupid?
Can I ask all intelligent people in this thread reading this (not many, I know), if someone tries very hard to disprove objective data which suggests gun control is useful in saving lives, would that person be more likely to be pro-gun or anti-gun?
If the data is wrong (which it isn't), by all means, talk about how it isn't peer-reviewed or whatever; I totally understand those science-based concerns. I do that myself even with studies I agree with in whole. But, that is clearly not what you're doing. You're just doing what the rest of these right-wing dumbnuts do: Try to discredit objective studies, so that your ill-formed ideologies aren't harmed.
Hell, I might be any negative adjective you can throw at me, but you're all wrong about gun control.
You're a fuckwit in so many dimensions it's a wonder you can operate a computer. There's only one person in our conversation that has outright dismissed data and that's you, ya delusional fuck. You've also shown a complete lack of reading comprehension and/or offered more proof your head is so far up your arse you cannot discern when someone you might not be arguing with you. You're the classic example of a far left extremist that is so tunnel blind, so convinced he holds the 100% pure and undiluted truth, that no one else can say anything of value...even when they might be agreeing with one of your positions.
Arguing when there's no argument is the most egregious example of being an arrogant asshole that has no right to be arrogant. I mean, sound out the words I closed my last my last (futile) post to you with:
You're as useless as tits on a bull, mate.