STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
This thread is an amateur anthropology trainwreck. It peaked at Highlander.
A lot of younger men around me (20s~30s) are into the stealth wealth thing, but I have come to the conclusion that they just don`t know how to dress appropriately for different situations.
I think it becomes ridiculous when you (hypothetically) find yourself torn between the all-white J Purcells and CP Achilles. One costs $65 and one costs $265; one has a distinguishing feature and one doesn't; and one is $200 more expensive. So I ask: Is it worth the extra two-hundo just to be stealth?
I think it becomes ridiculous when you (hypothetically) find yourself torn between the all-white J Purcells and CP Achilles. One costs $65 and one costs $265; one has a distinguishing feature and one doesn't; and one is $200 more expensive. So I ask: Is it worth the extra two-hundo just to be stealth?
Dragon, why do you equate stealth wealth with casualness?
Sorry but I don't think that's what the OP infers in using the term "stealth wealth" at all.
I think a bunch of the posters in this thread have a different idea of the definition of stealth wealth, however.
true. But I think most of us define stealth wealth as wearing unbadged, minimalist (lacking obvious and blatant detailings that show some work and $ was put into it) clothes that could stand next to offerings from Gap and Target, and possibly look the same, to the everyman.