or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › Current Events, Power and Money › Why Hillary will be the next POTUS
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why Hillary will be the next POTUS - Page 53

post #781 of 3293
I can't imagine she mean "where" in literally the physical sense, but this is some pretty professional revision of history:
post #782 of 3293
This is absolutely insane...

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/new-dinesh-dsouza-doc-is-so-woke.html
post #783 of 3293

Bernie!!!

 

Hillary is a crook. 

post #784 of 3293
Thread Starter 
So did Hillary actually do something wrong regarding her private email server?
post #785 of 3293
Hillary's base is being tough on her,
post #786 of 3293
It's over. Rubio and Kasich fucked Cruz and the country, hello Madame President.
Edited by coolpapa - 3/16/16 at 3:34am
post #787 of 3293
It's cute that you think Cruz isn't just as bad as Trump.
post #788 of 3293
It's cute that you think using cute in your attempted insult is cute.

I'm conservative and prefer an actual conservative. Cruz has his issues, but his record is consistent with what he's saying on the stump. I can't say the same for Trump.
post #789 of 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolpapa View Post

It's over. Rubio and Kasich fucked Cruz and the country, hello Madame President.

 

How did Rubio and Kasich fuck Cruz?  Trump still has to get 50%+1 of the delegates.  There is no way Cruz was going to win Ohio, and even without Rubio and Kasich, Florida would have been a stretch for him too.

 

Plus, I'm pretty sure the establishment rather lose with Trump than win with Cruz.

post #790 of 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piobaire View Post

So did Hillary actually do something wrong regarding her private email server?

 

According to some she is guilty and needs to be sentenced.  Having her own server was neither illegal nor against regulations.  It surely was a dumb move tho.  The most they "have" on her is that she received a couple non-classified emails that contained information that was classified at a later date (the level has not been disclosed AFAIK).  I'm waiting for them to disclose who sent the emails and detail:

 

  1. How and when the sender's email account was scrubbed;
  2. How and when the email accounts of every other recipient were scrubbed;
  3. Disclose if the sender or any other recipients were reprimanded and/or prosecuted for having a backdated classified email on an unclassified email system;
  4. Disclose how long after the emails were sent were they determined to contain classified information.  1 day, 1 week, 1 year?
  5. Disclose whose responsibility it is for policing email correspondence that has been classified after transmission: sender, recipients, IT admins, etc.
post #791 of 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumpelstiltskin View Post

According to some she is guilty and needs to be sentenced.  Having her own server was neither illegal nor against regulations.  It surely was a dumb move tho.  The most they "have" on her is that she received a couple non-classified emails that contained information that was classified at a later date (the level has not been disclosed AFAIK).  I'm waiting for them to disclose who sent the emails and detail:
  1. How and when the sender's email account was scrubbed;
  2. How and when the email accounts of every other recipient were scrubbed;
  3. Disclose if the sender or any other recipients were reprimanded and/or prosecuted for having a backdated classified email on an unclassified email system;
  4. Disclose how long after the emails were sent were they determined to contain classified information.  1 day, 1 week, 1 year?
  5. Disclose whose responsibility it is for policing email correspondence that has been classified after transmission: sender, recipients, IT admins, etc.

Did she send any classified emails?
post #792 of 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxgenius View Post


Did she send any classified emails?

 

no one has alleged that...yet.  You have to understand that at General Officer/SES level and above folks rarely send their own emails.  They have an entire office full of high ranking career administrators sorting, reading as well as sending their emails so probably not. 

post #793 of 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumpelstiltskin View Post

most they "have" on her is that she received a couple non-classified emails that contained information that was classified at a later date

A couple meaning about a thousand. She also sent hundreds of them. I don't know where you're getting those numbers.

And many, if not most, of these are messages that contained classified information that just wasn't marked classified at the time. It's not like something magically changed that made the information classified later. It was all supposed to be from the get-go.
post #794 of 3293
This belongs in so many threads on here, but I'll just post in this one.
post #795 of 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumpelstiltskin View Post

no one has alleged that...yet.  You have to understand that at General Officer/SES level and above folks rarely send their own emails.  They have an entire office full of high ranking career administrators sorting, reading as well as sending their emails so probably not. 

http://thefederalist.com/2016/03/07/clinton-104-emails-classified-information/
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Current Events, Power and Money
Styleforum › Forums › General › Current Events, Power and Money › Why Hillary will be the next POTUS