or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › Current Events, Power and Money › Why Hillary will be the next POTUS
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why Hillary will be the next POTUS - Page 127

post #1891 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal View Post


Man, this little gem was seriously overlooked.

 

post #1892 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibonius View Post


He's actually repeated the "we should just take all their oil" line recently. And people call Trump the "non-interventionist."



This is one of those places where just Trump talking is doing damage to the US. People in the Middle East hear this stuff, and you have a guy talking about literally annexing oil fields. That's the conspiracy theory we worked pretty hard to reject when Bush invaded, and now it's a serious policy proposal from the Republican candidate. Unbelievable.

 

Final Jeopardy:

 

Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Iran

 

Answer in the form of a question: "What are the eight countries Hillary voted in favor of, oversaw, or advocated bombing and/or invading?"

 

If you think talk "is doing damage to the US", what about a decade-long record of action?  If you are sincere (which you're absolutely not, about anything) about what you wrote above, there are two candidates for Prez who are acceptable to you, and they're not named Clinton or Trump.

post #1893 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by wojt View Post

It has some advantages, you can be well below intellectual standard and still be a politician see complete dumbfucks like Sarah Palin. If you are in politics and you're a women it does hold certain advantages because so few women are drawn to politics. Even in my backwards country last 2 PMs were women. For example you are viewed my favourably by low information women voters. Also women are more likely to vote (D) anyway and while maybe being a women is still a drawback for (R) it's for sure not a drawback for all kinds of democrats, progressives, independants etc
She did beat Sanders too; (45+ segment is bigger in terms of sheer numbers too)

Why the shit would you bin that into "45+" and "under 45"? Hillary lost among everyone in the Millennial demographic, including women.


There are plenty of dumbfuck male politicians, so I don't think that demonstrates anything.
post #1894 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCarraway View Post

So I take it you voted against this guy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCarraway View Post

Final Jeopardy:

Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Iran

Answer in the form of a question: "What are the eight countries Hillary voted in favor of, oversaw, or advocated bombing and/or invading?"

If you think talk "is doing damage to the US", what about a decade-long record of action?  If you are sincere (which you're absolutely not, about anything) about what you wrote above, there are two candidates for Prez who are acceptable to you, and they're not named Clinton or Trump.

You have some problems with context homie.
post #1895 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCarraway View Post

Final Jeopardy:

Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Iran

Answer in the form of a question: "What are the eight countries Hillary voted in favor of, oversaw, or advocated bombing and/or invading?"

If you think talk "is doing damage to the US", what about a decade-long record of action?  If you are sincere (which you're absolutely not, about anything) about what you wrote above, there are two candidates for Prez who are acceptable to you, and they're not named Clinton or Trump.

Neither Johnson or Stein were even in the Senate or Congress when the decision was made so who knows how they would have voted after being briefed on what was happening. Of course when the war went to shit everybody tried to deny ever being involved
post #1896 of 3262

Look at that strong woman powering through.
post #1897 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piobaire View Post

If Thatcher could win with a vagina surely Clinton can.

My thoughts exactly. Perhaps Brits are smarter doe. ..Brexit doe.
Yep my thoughts exactly.
post #1898 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCarraway View Post

Final Jeopardy:

Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Iran

Answer in the form of a question: "What are the eight countries Hillary voted in favor of, oversaw, or advocated bombing and/or invading?"

Shit man you're givin me a Hillaryboner here. Does a measly drone count here BTW? Either way.

..the only two things I never got about the libertarian platform were the pathetic regard for isolationism and the ridiculous obsession with the gold standard.
Everything else? Cat's pajamas.
post #1899 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by indesertum View Post

right cuz nobody has ever accused clinton of playing the vagina card

nobody else uses gender as a smear campaign right?



i dont understand why clinton isn't allowed to use the vagina card when her opponents get to use the penis card

I suppose a trans politician could play *both* cards?
post #1900 of 3262
post #1901 of 3262
Best line I have heard is,

"They tossed Hillary into that van like Freddie Gray. It's a good thing Hillary didn't die under mysterious circumstances or BLM would be rioting."
post #1902 of 3262
Two of those girls are wife worthy
post #1903 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by indesertum View Post

Two of those girls are wife worthy

We need more women Nobel Prize Winners because of sexist pigs like you.


P.S. Obama will veto 9/11 lawsuit bill, face override vote
https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-will-veto-911-lawsuit-bill-face-override-214923770.html?status=verifyfail

I sincerely hope he will veto, as collateral damage to Clintons campaign would be huge. Something tells me our Muslim-in-chief does not care anymore and might go with his true loyalty this time and veto to protect the Saudis he worships.
Edited by Medwed - 9/13/16 at 2:10am
post #1904 of 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Medwed View Post

We need more women Nobel Prize Winners because of sexist pigs like you.


P.S. Obama will veto 9/11 lawsuit bill, face override vote
https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-will-veto-911-lawsuit-bill-face-override-214923770.html?status=verifyfail

I sincerely hope he will veto, as collateral damage to Clintons campaign would be huge. Something tells me our Muslim-in-chief does not care anymore and might go with his true loyalty this time and veto to protect the Saudis he worships.


America has worshipped the Saudis for at least the past 3-4 Administrations. There are obviously multiple reasons for this, from oil to what we want to believe is a stabilizing force in the Mideast but to act like any US Administration in recent memory hasn't kowtowed to the Saudis is a bit silly.
post #1905 of 3262
We've been protecting the Sauds since Eisenhower and at least since Bush Sr presidents have had personal relationships with the Saud family. Blaming only Obama is just straight up ignant with a blind eye to history
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Current Events, Power and Money
Styleforum › Forums › General › Current Events, Power and Money › Why Hillary will be the next POTUS