Originally Posted by Made in California
Maybe things are different in Canada, but where I've grown up in the liberal state of California, wearing animal print will get you tagged as certified gay. And not just by insecure guys (which is a demographic you can fairly easily ignore), but by straight women and gay guys. If this is not the impression you want to put forth, and you want women to think you're straight (or at least give you a chance of being straight) then you would be wise to pick different patterns. Should it be this way? Is it fair that you will be labeled gay for wearing your favorite print? No, but you have to live in the real world Uncontrol where your choice of patterns says a lot about you whether you want it to or not. Leopard print stuff will unnecessarily set you back a couple steps with the opposite sex [unless you've got some PUA metagame plan for it]. Edit: For underwear this conversation is a little superfluous because by the time they see it they're already beyond the point of no return.
This guy is hilarious. I'm engaged (to a woman) and live in West Hollywood. I will buy some leopard print boxer briefs in spite of you. I don't even like animal prints. On another note, his font is purple!!! He must be gay everyone! I live in California, and when people write in purple, they are seen as gay. Certified gay. Trust me, I live in West Hollywood, I'm a professional. This dude totally, certifiably, looks gay. Better change your font color. Just trying to help - not homophobic or anything. Now excuse while I go purchase some leopard underwear. I'll ask for the extra gay ones.