pejsek
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2004
- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 5
rnoldh, I think what Will was probably referring to was A&S's default position of not cutting working buttonholes if not specifically asked. I once had a beautiful A&S jacket from the 1950s (moth casualty, rip) and, iirc, it too had working buttonholes. I think the austere and most respected SR tradition has long been to have two working buttons on a jacket (sportcoat or suit); to have them all work has historically been seen as a bit gauche--not that that hasn't regularly been done by all the major makers. A&S was probably staking out the contrarian position with its no working buttonhole policy. Part of the rationale of the no more than two working buttons approach has been that fewer working buttons makes it easier to shorten the sleeve without taking it up at the shoulder. So, as you see, there has been an expectation that these clothes would pass from one generation to the next. I've been doing my best to keep that tradition alive.