• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Religious Discriminiation in Private Universities

slycedbred

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
1,459
Reaction score
6
Is it legal for a private christian university to give christians precedence over other religious standpoints in terms of dorm placement, job placement, and leadership opportunities (such as RA positions)?
 

DNW

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
9,976
Reaction score
6
In a word, Yes. Discrimination on the basis of religion by private universities is not prohibited by the Constitution.
 

taxgenius

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
5,780
Reaction score
1,187
Originally Posted by DarkNWorn
In a word, Yes. Discrimination on the basis of religion by private universities is not prohibited by the Constitution.

I don't think the constitution governs private enterprises at all - it merely limits the power of the government.
 

wpeters

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by taxgenius69
I don't think the constitution governs private enterprises at all - it merely limits the power of the government.

It's really good that your name isn't constitutiongenius69.
 

taxgenius

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
5,780
Reaction score
1,187
Originally Posted by wpeters
It's really good that your name isn't constitutiongenius69.

Help me out here. Where am I wrong.
 

odoreater

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
8,587
Reaction score
45
Originally Posted by taxgenius69
Help me out here. Where am I wrong.

Through liberal (lowercase "l") interpretation, the constitution has been held to apply to a lot of private conduct as well. Usually this is accomplished through the commerce clause.
 

taxgenius

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
5,780
Reaction score
1,187
Originally Posted by odoreater
Through liberal (lowercase "l") interpretation, the constitution has been held to apply to a lot of private conduct as well. Usually this is accomplished through the commerce clause.

Can you give an example of how this controlled private conduct?
 

DNW

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
9,976
Reaction score
6
Originally Posted by taxgenius69
Can you give an example of how this controlled private conduct?

Minimum wage.
 

wpeters

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by taxgenius69
Can you give an example of how this controlled private conduct?

Prohibition against racial discrimination in the sale or rental of housing. Sale and/or rental of private property is a paradigmatic "private conduct," but the Constitution prohibits discrimination in this area.
 

Fuuma

Franchouillard Modasse
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
26,949
Reaction score
14,542
Originally Posted by Ludeykrus
And other forms of discrimination.

Yes, liberal interpretation has intruded into the area of private institution and contract.


Intended at the start or not, would you like to live in a society where the constitution did not protect civic liberties when the government is not one of the parties involved? You guys will have to get out of the "US constitution as a sacred text" bullshit and realise it is either an evolving (albeit slowly) document or a text that becomes irrelevent as time passes by.
 

Ludeykrus

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
4
Originally Posted by Fuuma
Intended at the start or not, would you like to live in a society where the constitution did not protect civic liberties when the government is not one of the parties involved? You guys will have to get out of the "US constitution as a sacred text" bullshit and realise it is either an evolving (albeit slowly) document or a text that becomes irrelevent as time passes by.

There are a number of things I don't find ideal or pleasant, but do not find it the government's role to enforce.

I am one of those "bullshitters" that believes the Constitution is a strict set of rules that was created by men who had more wisdom than most any men today. I believe the rules are just, if not more, applicable today, and that it should be strictly interpreted. The rules were laid out in an explicit manner and were not designed to evolve. The ammendment process being excluded, obviously.
 

lawyerdad

Lying Dog-faced Pony Soldier
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
27,006
Reaction score
17,142
Originally Posted by DarkNWorn
Minimum wage.

Odoreater and DW are generally correct here, but left out a step in the analysis. The Commerce Clause of the Constitution has been read as a fairly broad grant of authority to the federal government over areas that might otherwise be exclusively with the control of the various states. Thus, the Commerce Clause is the basis for the authority for the federal government, through affirmative legislative action, to do things like set a federal minimum wage or pass the Civil Rights Act (both of which regulate private conduct having a connection to interstate commerce).
Those limitations on purely private (i.e., non-governmental) conduct do not stem from any inherent limitation on private conduct in the Constitution per se, but rather from statutory limitations enacted pursuant the authority granted to Congress in the Constitution.
 

odoreater

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
8,587
Reaction score
45
Originally Posted by Ludeykrus
The rules were laid out in an explicit manner and were not designed to evolve.

How can you be so sure? What makes you certain that, in a system where all laws are subject to judicial interpretation, this one document was never meant to be interpreted and applied to situations that the original framers did not anticipate?



Btw, I'm not one of those people that believes the constitution is a strict set of rules that was meant to be beyond interpretation, and I did not use the term "liberal interpretation" in such a way as to imply any kind of value judgment. I was using the term "liberal" in a generic sort of way.
 

lawyerdad

Lying Dog-faced Pony Soldier
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
27,006
Reaction score
17,142
Originally Posted by wpeters
It's really good that your name isn't constitutiongenius69.
That makes two of you.
Originally Posted by Ludeykrus
And other forms of discrimination.

Yes, liberal interpretation has intruded into the area of private institution and contract.


I'm sure that line really wows the chicks, at least those of the Anne Coulter variety. Unfortunately, it's wrong.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,476
Messages
10,589,754
Members
224,251
Latest member
rollover80
Top