even if granted that Wikileaks cooperates with Russians- which there is ZERO proof of
but for sake of the argument, let's assume it's Russians who are 100% behind it
Than STILL disinformation is intentionally false or misleading. DNC emails are legit, their legitimacy was never questioned, even by Clinton on the debate stage. So even if Russia is trying to influence USA politics, still they are providing TRUE albeit stolen information.
so what's exactly you argument against knowing more facts?