mensimageconsultant
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,600
- Reaction score
- 145
GQ makes a good effort. The fun part is critiquing the suggestions
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Nobody writes anything about those of us who are neither short nor tall, fat nor skinny nor muscular etc.
Wouldn't the world be your oyster?
Wouldn't the world be your oyster?
Some people are never happy.
Not a bad article.
I felt Chuck Liddel is a bad example of the muscular body type. He is fit, but not bulking with a big drop, they should have used someone like Christian Bale when he was playing Batman (where he gained like 100 lbs for the role from his previous role) .........
There's at least one source that gives plenty of advice on tall + heavy. (More on that in the months ahead, perhaps.)
It is tough to get bigger and more drop than Lidell without incredible genetics or chemical enhancement. I think he is a good example of a standard muscular build.
There's at least one source that gives plenty of advice on tall + heavy. (More on that in the months ahead, perhaps.)