Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Inside Shoes....Martegani + A/E
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Inside Shoes....Martegani + A/E

post #1 of 49
Thread Starter 
Not to let the clothing guys have all the fun, here are the details of construction for Martegani and A/E shoes care of the bandsaw.....

The Victims.....(oops, lost pic of original A/E....is an 5+ year old Bradley)

[IMG][/IMG]

View of 3 piece (outsole/midsole/insole) Blake/Rapid construction:

[IMG][/IMG]

View of Welted (outsole/cork+glue/insole) construction:

[IMG][/IMG]

Comparison view:

[IMG][/IMG]

Notes - both factories have the machines set up to stitch 6 spi for sole/welt work and, despite the material difference, both put 1/2 inch between your feet and the pavement.

Shank Areas:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

Note: Martegani is using a Texon shank piece with an integrated steel shank (narrow) while A/E, as we know, uses a 'shankless' construction. There is a piece of Texon like material in the heel/shank area of the A/E that I assume they use as a plate for the nails, as the heels are nailed on from the outside up. Martegani heel bases are nailed from the inside down...more on heels later.

Neither shoe is seamed anywhere:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

I had always thought A/E used a different outsole source....actually never heard of this company, but from what I can gather, they are out of business.

Uppers:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

Again, very similiar work....both use cotton interlinings, both factories set the machines to stitch 13 spi on the upper seams, obviously all seams skived. A/E backs the eyelets with grommets, Martegani does not.

[IMG][/IMG]

Both use compressed leather heel cups....both are the same size.

Notes: Both manufacturers use man-made toe puffs and both sprung back without denting, which is the reason to use these. Both uppers are analine finished and carry the same depth....the A/E is an old calf that I don't think they source any longer, but it is really good - someone else will have to scratch off a newer pair to see the depth of finish. The A/E uses a thicker lining of looser grain...Martegani is about 2/3 the thickness and of tighter grain. The A/E insoles are about the best in the business, IMO. There is quite a bit more glue than cork here though, and you can see the great difference in the forming of the insoles after wear. I am sure this varies with each pair of A/E.

Outsole/insole leather:

[IMG][/IMG]

Interesting picture to look closely at.....see the grain structure difference between the two soles? The grain on the Martegani is very tight, which would explain the lack of customers taking me up on sending our shoes back to the factory for re-sole work....in two years of wholesale and 4 years of retail, I have yet to have one sent to me for re-soling. I am sure some have needed it, but I have not been sent any. In A/E's defense, I know for a fact that they have long tried to use US suppliers for outsoles, and the availability here (I think are all gone, now) is far different than what the Italians can depend on. As a final note, Martegani soaks all outsoles with water and rolls with metal rollers after the stitching is done....this must compress the fibers even more, as well as closing the seam on the outside stitch without the need for a cut/covered channel.

Heels:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

Here was the only real surprise to me.....Martegani is using a tight grained layered leather combination heel and A/E is using a fiberboard toplift over a rubber base. I don't think it has any bearing on wear, but this might explain the somewhat consistent, minor seperation between the outsole and heel base that you can often see on A/E shoes.

End of story....comments welcomed.
post #2 of 49
When they came for the suits, I remained silent, for they were not my suits. When they came for the shoes ...

Nice post, Ron. You should add this to the Wiki. But why a linen-covered plastic feather?
post #3 of 49
Oh God.

What's next: Lattanzi and EG?!?!

I can see it now.... Arguing about how much handwork a John Lobb has, and how (the members) say, Wow, parts of it is Machine made (the Goodyear Welting....)

Very Few makers do it by hand now days, and I believe Stefano Bemer is one of those that does it by hand.
post #4 of 49
Excellent! Let's cut up some EGs and Lobbs now. Manton, where are those old EG captoes of yours? I've got a saw that would like to meet them.
post #5 of 49
Thread Starter 
Quote:
But why a linen-covered plastic feather?

They have to add that (it's standard for all 'Goodyear' welt factories) to hold the curved stitch.

Compare that to Vass (no, I'm not cutting up my Vass shoes!) where they carve out the feather and you can understand how much more work is involved in the 'True Goodyear' method of production.
post #6 of 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHolliday View Post
When they came for the suits, I remained silent, for they were not my suits. When they came for the shoes ...

LOL, ATFAAIA*




* "and then feeling awkward about it after"
post #7 of 49
Ron,

What an informative post!

I am one who remains a little perplexed by the privileged position of goodyear welted shoes in most of the discussion. I do observe that the high end English shoes are Goodyear, whereas Blake seems to be more an Italian attribute. Is that true?

Aside from the cork footbed molding to the foot, what is the advantage of goodyear construction to blake or blake/rapid?

Is blake/rapid less time-consuming and hence less expensive? If Edward Green were to make a shoe with EG uppers on the 82 last with blake/rapid, and there fore charged 25% less, I'd buy it!

Both can be resoled.
Both, as you point out, have soles of similar thickness.

Perhaps, goodyear is more water resistant? Even without the storm welt.

Can the footbed issue be addressed with a padded liner?

I have been very happy with my blake/rapid constructions from Martegani and Borgioli.

Perhaps I should care about construction more but I select my shoes based on the aesthetic of the last and design, the quality and finish of the uppers, the fit, and the care and finish of the construction (regardless of approach.)
post #8 of 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIDER View Post
They have to add that (it's standard for all 'Goodyear' welt factories) to hold the curved stitch.

Interesting. I knew about the feather, but had no idea it was made of plastic.
post #9 of 49
Thread Starter 
Quote:
I do observe that the high end English shoes are Goodyear, whereas Blake seems to be more an Italian attribute. Is that true?

Generally speaking, yes.

Quote:
Aside from the cork footbed molding to the foot, what is the advantage of goodyear construction to blake or blake/rapid?

I am cleaning up pics of a Blake Moreschi shoe now....you can decide for yourself. As for Blake/Rapid - Goodyear, none IMO. Of course, my OPINION is that when you glue on a feather you should not call it Goodyear construction, I don't care what the stitcher is called. If we had rules in our business, 'Goodyear' would only be used when a feather is carved from the insole....if I made the rules .

Quote:
Perhaps, goodyear is more water resistant? Even without the storm welt.

Nope...not at all.
post #10 of 49
somehow this hits me harder than the jackets. I dunno why. I laughed at the jackets being cut. But shoes.... hmm....

anyway Rider do you have an opinion about what is the best construction?
post #11 of 49
Thread Starter 
I think they all have their place....it's more a question of materials than anything, IMO. Plus, different sytles and details can call for different constructions.
post #12 of 49
Quote:
Excellent! Let's cut up some EGs and Lobbs now.

I just set my home security alarm. I have guns.

P.S. Great post Ron. Very useful.
post #13 of 49
Fantastic post Ron. The level of informed discussion on this forum is going through the roof. Why cannot they post articles like this in Vogue or GQ?
post #14 of 49
You can repair these, with package tape (clear).
post #15 of 49
Quote:
Why cannot they post articles like this in Vogue or GQ?

Because people armed with this information would stop buying their advertisers: Armani, Prada, Gucci, Polo, etc.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Men's Clothing
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Inside Shoes....Martegani + A/E