Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kai 
I'm sad it was wrecked, but I'm glad he's driving it. I love vintage racing and am grateful for the guys with enough money and balls to race 13 million dollar cars so guys like me can watch and enjoy them.
That car is no doubt already at a restoration shop somewhere, and will be back in action before too long. I've seen vintage cars beat up much more than that that were fixed up good as new.
Any vintage car with a significant racing history likely has gone through several engines and bunches of body panels, so the fact that some of the original parts might have to be replaced doesn't bother me.
I understand the argument about owners of significant historical pieces being stewards for the next generation. However, I respect people who own unique pieces of art that loan them to museums for all to see and appreciate rather than keeping the art in a vault somewhere.
Folks who drive vintage cars allow us to view those cars as they were meant to be viewed, (on the track) and this allows the rest of us to appreciate them all the more.
Kai, I know you track your car, and I appreciate your perspective. However, just as there is a middle-road between hanging art in a museum for everybody to see and keeping it in a vault for nobody to see, so too is there a middle-road in between keeping a car stored in a garage and driving it pedal to the metal.
In my opinion, the suggestion by many here, "Great - this is how the car is meant to be driven, and the owner is using the car in the way it was designed to perform" fails.
Let me ask this. Paintings were made to be looked at and enjoyed. If someone acquired the Mona Lisa and would most enjoy it hanging it his office, where he spends almost all his time and gets all the sun in his house, would you be ok with him hanging the painting right in the sun? It's going to fade and ruin it. But he's going to be enjoying it while it's hanging there.
The same issue applies here. If the original gear box case is cracked, it can't be restored. It can be re-manufactured but the one that ran at Le Mans and finished third at Daytona, and has the original stamps to prove it, is gone for ever.
The problem with the argument that vintage cars should be driven balls-to-the-wall is that it is self-defeating.
We all agree that these cars were meant to be driven. The problem with concluding that as a result they should be driven 9/10 or 10/10 in competition is that this significantly increases the chances of severe damage or complete destruction. This means that nobody in the future will be able to enjoy the car as it was intended. If your use of an item destroys other people's future use of that item, then your use defeats the very lofty purposes that you are claiming to pursue, because it renders the item unable to be used as it was intended.
The point is that enjoying and driving a car does not mean driving it 10/10th any more than enjoying a painting means hanging it in the sun. There are other ways to enjoy a historically significant item responsibly without significantly endangering the item's use for others in the future. As a result, I believe some responsibility comes with ownership to keep these things around for other people to enjoy. You can still enjoy the car and drive it hard while achieving that.