• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

ridethecliche

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
10,154
Reaction score
3,867
I think that 'shorter' cuffs would make him appear taller in that picture, but I also don't remember the last time I saw someone wearing a suit and saw that they had cuffs and thought "Huh, those are too short/tall". They're what, 2 inch cuffs? 2.5 inch cuffs?

And yeah, I'm totally open to being wrong. I tend to learn more when I am!
 

spectre

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
504

Please excuse the pocket square always have a tendency to pop up by the end of the day.

1000



1000


Consistent excellence. Best thing I can do is refrain from commenting unless you have an off day, which I know is not going to happen.
Always a joy to see your outfits, you know precisely how to be understated and elegant yet never boring. I have a bit to learn.
 

Academic2

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
2,946
Reaction score
4,276
None of what follows is directed at RTC or indeed any of the postings today. I’m merely taking advantage of the current meta-discussion to offer some thoughts about commentary in this thread.

The comments I find most useful are those which are based upon some agreed-upon norm (however broadly defined) and not mere personal preference or taste. JMHO, YMMV, etc.

To give a personal example, I confess that I do not like pebble-grain split-toe Bluchers. There’s nothing objectively wrong with them and they are certainly an acceptable option within the classic style. They are simply not to my taste, just like I don’t like anchovies on my pizza. I recognize that’s my personal quirk, and I would never negatively comment on them in someone’s fit if they were used in an appropriate overall context.

However, if someone wore a pair of them with a very formal worsted charcoal suit, conservative shirt and understated tie, I might remark that the shoes could be seen as too casual for the rest of the fit. That observation would be independent of my feelings about the shoes in isolation, having to do merely with the assumption of consistency that is a part of classic style.

The comments I find most useful come from those members with a sufficient knowledge of classic style that they know the difference between their personal biases and genuine departures from the norms and assumptions of that style.

Cheers,

Ac
 
Last edited:

spectre

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
504

@tchoy
, small nit to pick, but I think it would look more proportional with slightly smaller cuffs.


Preference I suppose. I have the same width cuffs and would never go smaller.
 

ammanati

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
399
Reaction score
602
None of what follows is directed at RTC or indeed any of the postings today. I’m merely taking advantage of the current meta-discussion to offer some thoughts about commentary in this thread.

The comments I find most useful are those which are based upon some agreed-upon norm (however broadly defined) and not mere personal preference or taste. JMHO, YMMV, etc.

To give a personal example, I confess that I do not like pebble-grain split-toe Bluchers. There’s nothing objectively wrong with them and they are certainly an acceptable option within the classic style. They are simply not to my taste, just like I don’t like anchovies on my pizza. I recognize that’s my personal quirk, and I would never negatively comment on them in someone’s fit if they were used in an appropriate overall context.

However, if someone wore a pair of them with a very formal worsted charcoal suit, conservative shirt and understated tie, I might remark that the shoes could be seen as too casual for the rest of the fit. That observation would be independent of my feelings about the shoes in isolation, having to do merely with the assumption of consistency that is a part of classic style.

The comments I find most useful come from those members with a sufficient knowledge of classic style that they know the difference between their personal biases and genuine departures from the norms and assumptions of that style.

Cheers,

Ac

This !
 

ridethecliche

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
10,154
Reaction score
3,867
If someone could just change my tag to 'Village Idiot' then that'd be great.
 

GMMcL

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,851
Reaction score
8,881
No. You're just learning. -- Thanks for the thumbs yesterday. Here's today. FWIW, I tried a blue shirt and it didn't get along with the blue in the jacket. I've seen lots of you do it, and I can never quite seem to pull it off. Had I had more time, I think I might have chosen a different shirt, but c'est la vie.
 

spectre

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
504

If someone could just change my tag to 'Village Idiot' then that'd be great.


I've been interested in dressing well for 50 years and I'm still learning more about my style and that in general. For most of that time, of course, there was nothing like an internet chat forum to help and receive input.
The very fact you're here is a major step.
 

Kid Nickels

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,821
Reaction score
1,897

Kid Nickels

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,821
Reaction score
1,897

... but it could perhaps look a little off to those who've started off in the #menswear era of shorter, tighter jackets and lower-waisted, tapered trousers, or who are just still training their eye.


Sometimes I think this #menswear or "GQ made me do it" idea is bullshit. Not disagreeing with you entirely FM, but it's kinda like popular music sucked when I was a kid and I still figured out to listen to Zeppelin and Hendrix instead. It should be pretty obvious that none of that **** looks good.
 

justinkapur

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
8,697
Reaction score
9,861

This looks nice JK. I wasn't going to comment until I noticed the bracelet. Is that a kara and if so why on your left?


Great observation. It is in fact a Kara and it's on my right just looks deceiving because of the mirror
 

Kid Nickels

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,821
Reaction score
1,897

Great observation. It is in fact a Kara and it's on my right just looks deceiving because of the mirror


I thought that may have been the case but couldn't remember how the inversion worked when I posted my own shots so I thought it was on your left which is why I asked because I know it is to be worn on the right. Cool.. thanks! And I still liked your combo in the previous fit... elegant and good looking.
 
Last edited:

aglose

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
858
Reaction score
166
400

Please excuse the dirty mirror and bad tie knot, still very much learning how to dress better. I would like feed back however, Shoes are RL Linderick Cordovan. Also, excuse the phone in the pic, was the best I could do.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 86 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 23 10.2%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.6%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 16.0%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,408
Messages
10,588,985
Members
224,224
Latest member
alphaequity9
Top