(marc37 @ 21 July 2004, 11:10) l would be the first to go. People hate my guts on this forum and Andy's. lt is just a case of being misunderstood.
Like I said, weird is okay.
J, glad that you are now keeping an eye on the various goings on, on this (your) forum. I would just like a definition of "weird" as per your usage towards marc37? for example: Styleforum shoe discussion
All posts by marc-au:
...T4phage: l don't trust you. l used to have an available email address and website but, l can't trust people like marc39 and you. You are a troll and a trouble maker. l don't know whether to like you or not. M.g is a homosexual. (Nothing against them but it is dirty).
- a baseless attack coupled with a baseless accusation against a former (and thus unable to defend himself) member.
....T4phage has no credibility. Who cares if he has or knows about good shoes. lf he is not a good person, he is not worth spitting on.
-spitting on??? or how about the killing and eating people? Styleforum discussion on self image
... l enjoy inflicking misery and pain on my fellow man.... like seeing people suffering and in pain. l hate all the people in the world; l wish 95% of the humans on earth were destroyed (Don't want all of the humans dead, l have to eat something). ....
- this is "weird"
?? Remember the recent flap about the German cannibal. Please inform us if this is the definition of "weird", and these kinds of posts are allowed since "weird" is ok. If so, are we then allowed to spill vitriol on whatever we choose? Sincerely, T4phage