or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Which clothing brand impresses the ladies the most?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Which clothing brand impresses the ladies the most? - Page 2

post #16 of 166
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hentaisan View Post
 


which part of asia?


Eastern Asia, places like China, HK, and Japan, the kind of Asians who come to the US and clean out an entire store of Louis Vuitton and buying their kids Ferrari.

 

The kind of people who judge you not by your character, but by what you drive, where you live and WHAT YOU WEAR. Working there, wearing brands that impress is necessary for upward motility.

post #17 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by archibaldleach View Post

The topic of this thread is dumb. I'm sorry, but it is. In 98% of the interactions I have had with women (actually most likely a higher percentage), the brand of my clothing has never come up. Buy things that fit you and that look good on you. If you look good and are well dressed, nobody is going to care. Unless you are a complete idiot who walks around and actually says, "Hey, look at me. I am wearing XYZ brand." it is not going to be a subject of conversation. Would you rather have 1/100 women who talk to you walk away because you are not wearing the right brand or look better and have many more women talk to you?

Buy stuff you look good in. Brand is irrelevant. This is not hard.

 

THIS.

post #18 of 166

Amazingly, my peer's Louis Vuitton goalie gear didn't get him any action from the puck-bunnies:

 

post #19 of 166
About 30 $100 bills sticking out of your pocket instead of the mundane PS will let them know "this guy is the shiz" or some other shi__ no question.
post #20 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterFu View Post

Any woman who is impressed by the branding of your clothes is the wrong kind of woman.

But if classless, tacky and vapid is what you're aiming for, be sure to leave all the Burberry, LV, Todd's and DG tags on your outfit. Maybe staple a few fake ones on while you're at it.

 

Well said!

post #21 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erichmax View Post
 


Eastern Asia, places like China, HK, and Japan, the kind of Asians who come to the US and clean out an entire store of Louis Vuitton and buying their kids Ferrari.

 

The kind of people who judge you not by your character, but by what you drive, where you live and WHAT YOU WEAR. Working there, wearing brands that impress is necessary for upward motility.


yep some shameless gold diggers in those parts

post #22 of 166

This thread turned from really shitty to pretty majestic.

post #23 of 166
You guys can flame and troll the OP as much as you want but it doesn't change the fact that this thread touches on a critical topic that all you clothing nerd snobs forget.

While appearing attractive to the opposite sex (i.e., brand agnostic fit/style appropriateness and genetics above all else), the real question is, what is most likely to be perceived as exclusive to others? It all boils down to what people are aware of, which is generally big name fashion brands - Armani, Prada, Gucci, etc. If a label dual-makes for men and women and is still popular in the world of aspirational women's products, that is what you want.

You could run your mouth all day about your nice incotex trousers, your Edward green shoes, and your brioni shirt, but chances are this draws a blank with all but a special subset of women (those who dated/married clothing snobs or who had a very wealthy father)
post #24 of 166
"I get my suits, shirts, ties, and shoes custom made for me, and pay half of what I would for an Armani suit. I shop smart."

Gets them wet every time. Especially after I flash my name and a quote embroidered on the inside of the jacket and let them feel the velvet suspenders.
post #25 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patek14 View Post

You guys can flame and troll the OP as much as you want but it doesn't change the fact that this thread touches on a critical topic that all you clothing nerd snobs forget.

While appearing attractive to the opposite sex (i.e., brand agnostic fit/style appropriateness and genetics above all else), the real question is, what is most likely to be perceived as exclusive to others? It all boils down to what people are aware of, which is generally big name fashion brands - Armani, Prada, Gucci, etc. If a label dual-makes for men and women and is still popular in the world of aspirational women's products, that is what you want.

You could run your mouth all day about your nice incotex trousers, your Edward green shoes, and your brioni shirt, but chances are this draws a blank with all but a special subset of women (those who dated/married clothing snobs or who had a very wealthy father)

This is just silly. A woman forms an initial opinion of your attractiveness before she knows what brand of clothing you are wearing and it is based on your overall appearance, confidence, etc.. How well you are dressed plays into this, but the brand doesn't 99% of the time. Name dropping (be it names of people you know, places you've been to or brands you wear) has always been the act of the desperate trying to find a way to seek validation. By the time anyone asks what brand your clothes are (if they even ask), your answer isn't going to make that much of a difference with respect to their overall impression. The fact that you are positing a scenario where people talk up the brands of clothing they are wearing, be they well known fashion brands or not, shows that you do not get it.
post #26 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by archibaldleach View Post


This is just silly. A woman forms an initial opinion of your attractiveness before she knows what brand of clothing you are wearing and it is based on your overall appearance, confidence, etc.. How well you are dressed plays into this, but the brand doesn't 99% of the time. Name dropping (be it names of people you know, places you've been to or brands you wear) has always been the act of the desperate trying to find a way to seek validation. By the time anyone asks what brand your clothes are (if they even ask), your answer isn't going to make that much of a difference with respect to their overall impression. The fact that you are positing a scenario where people talk up the brands of clothing they are wearing, be they well known fashion brands or not, shows that you do not get it.

+100000000000000000

But instead of bashing you, I'll offer some help.

 

It's not the brand that matters but the style. I particularly like RL clothing but I won't get anything with a horse logo on it. It's also pretty overpriced for the quality (so I only buy when there's a sale), but I really like some of the styles that they offer. I know my tastes will change soon and I'll go on to buy clothes from other brands, but as of right now, I dress RL because I  like it, and not because I'm trying to impress anyone. When you dress in a style that you like and works for you, that's when people start complimenting you. Women won't know what brand you're wearing unless you're wearing something with huge obnoxious logos which is NOT cool/fashionable.

 

I was gifted a gucci scarf with the traditional red/green stripes and a burberry polo for christmas by my gf's mother and they've been sitting in the closet since. 

post #27 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erichmax View Post
 

The kind of people who judge you not by your character, but by what you drive, where you live and WHAT YOU WEAR. Working there, wearing brands that impress is necessary for upward motility.

I can't speak for China, but this isn't true for Seoul, Tokyo, or Hong Kong. This is especially false for Seoul, where ostensible branding is actually going to be deleterious to upward mobility, at least in corporate Korea.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patek14 View Post

You guys can flame and troll the OP as much as you want but it doesn't change the fact that this thread touches on a critical topic that all you clothing nerd snobs forget.

While appearing attractive to the opposite sex (i.e., brand agnostic fit/style appropriateness and genetics above all else), the real question is, what is most likely to be perceived as exclusive to others? It all boils down to what people are aware of, which is generally big name fashion brands - Armani, Prada, Gucci, etc. If a label dual-makes for men and women and is still popular in the world of aspirational women's products, that is what you want.

You could run your mouth all day about your nice incotex trousers, your Edward green shoes, and your brioni shirt, but chances are this draws a blank with all but a special subset of women (those who dated/married clothing snobs or who had a very wealthy father)

"Clothing nerd snob." I like that. Though I don't look down on people who don't try to dress in anyway, I definitely due look down on people who try and fail. I don't judge the direction, but I can be a dick about the execution. Anyway, it's a good description.

 

And while I agree that Edward Green is likely not going to ring any bells with women, I promise you they recognize quality. They won't know why, but I'll bet dollars to donuts that they can tell that the Edward Green is nicer than the Bally.

post #28 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claghorn View Post
 

I can't speak for China, but this isn't true for Seoul, Tokyo, or Hong Kong. This is especially false for Seoul, where ostensible branding is actually going to be deleterious to upward mobility, at least in corporate Korea.

 

"Clothing nerd snob." I like that. Though I don't look down on people who don't try to dress in anyway, I definitely due look down on people who try and fail. I don't judge the direction, but I can be a dick about the execution. Anyway, it's a good description.

 

And while I agree that Edward Green is likely not going to ring any bells with women, I promise you they recognize quality. They won't know why, but I'll bet dollars to donuts that they can tell that the Edward Green is nicer than the Bally.

I agree with this to a certain extent. They won't be able to tell difference from Allen Edmonds/Aldens/Crockett Jones vs Edward Greens/Lobbs. Hell even average guys who shop at Nordstroms, Macys, etc. wouldn't either. I think they would mainly use indicators like a leather sole (as opposed to rubber soles you find on department store shoes) and the sleekness of the last to tip them off that it is a shoe of quality.

post #29 of 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by archibaldleach View Post

This is just silly. A woman forms an initial opinion of your attractiveness before she knows what brand of clothing you are wearing and it is based on your overall appearance, confidence, etc.. How well you are dressed plays into this, but the brand doesn't 99% of the time. Name dropping (be it names of people you know, places you've been to or brands you wear) has always been the act of the desperate trying to find a way to seek validation. By the time anyone asks what brand your clothes are (if they even ask), your answer isn't going to make that much of a difference with respect to their overall impression. The fact that you are positing a scenario where people talk up the brands of clothing they are wearing, be they well known fashion brands or not, shows that you do not get it.

Are you illiterate? What I said is exactly what I've bolded in your post. This is what I wrote, cut and pasted:

While appearing attractive to the opposite sex (i.e., brand agnostic fit/style appropriateness and genetics above all else),

what part of "genetics above all else" was unclear?
post #30 of 166

:lurk:

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Which clothing brand impresses the ladies the most?