fritzl
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Messages
- 12,266
- Reaction score
- 268
oh, it's easy. you present your knowledge in an authentic manner. i like this.
regarding the price i was referring to the MSRP of € 2400. the ad was in a car magazine(Austria).
well, let me say, i really don't like the ceramic versions, which are so popular. I do not endorse Rolex's decision to jump more or less completely on this train. I can imagine, I'm not a technician by any sort, that the material is superior and it shows some techonological leadership, which is part of the watch game, imo.
I will definitely let you know about my thoughts.
Hi fritzl, earlier I meant to say thank you for the kind words about my previous post.
Even if you decide its not the right watch for you, I look forward to hearing your thoughts once you have seen it in person.The more I look at the red/burgandy bezel, the more I like it. In addtition, the more I thought about the price, the more I thought this watch represents a fantastic opportunity for Rolex/Tudor, particularly here in the US to get a strong foothold in the under $5,000 market for sports watches in the US. I was just in a Rolex AD yesterday, and I saw the the Non-Date Ceramic Sub for the first time in person. Overall, I liked the watch. Over the years I've owned 3 Subs and each had the date. But these watches are starting to carry prices that seem a bit high for a steel Rolex. The non-date Sub was $7,500 and the Sub Date was $8550. To be honest I was surprised the price difference was so great. Years ago the price difference was only a few hundred dollars and the differences for a while were more significant (such as different movement, no chronometer cert. for the no date, and then there was the solid end links on the Sub Date, and then more recently, there was the ceramic bezel and solid bracelet to further distinguish the two watches and price differences. I think when the non-date Sub was closer to $6,000 someone who might spend upto $5,000 might stretch and spend a bit more to get it. But now the gap between those wanting a new Rolex Sub but who can only spend around $5K are even further from their wish of owning one. However, the Tudor if as you suggest hits our shores at around $3,000 that might satisfiy a lot of would be buyers desires to own a Sub, and maybe take some sales from other companies with watches prices significantly less than a Rolex Sub.
However, I think for this Tudor to really have some good sales figures in the States, Rolex will have to spend some money and advertise the watch. I regularly see advertisements for various Rolex watches in many types of magazines such as watch magazines, automobile magazines, fashion magazines, travel magazines, and sports magazines. However, the few times I see ads for Tudor in US magazines, its only in watch magazines. I never see ads for Tudors in automobile magazines, sports magazines, or travel magazines. I think Rolex should spend some money and spread the word about this great new diving watch. With such a reasonable price its a great opportunity for Rolex/Tudor, now its a matter of whether they really take advantage of this watch a market it properly. I guess we will have to wait and see what Rolex does with this watch.
oh, it's easy. you present your knowledge in an authentic manner. i like this.
regarding the price i was referring to the MSRP of € 2400. the ad was in a car magazine(Austria).
well, let me say, i really don't like the ceramic versions, which are so popular. I do not endorse Rolex's decision to jump more or less completely on this train. I can imagine, I'm not a technician by any sort, that the material is superior and it shows some techonological leadership, which is part of the watch game, imo.
I will definitely let you know about my thoughts.