or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread - Page 1212

post #18166 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by mreister View Post

Hi all,

 

Thought I'd join in on the conversation finally, after reading (I think) the entirety of this thread and enjoying it immensely.  I particularly enjoyed the Rolex discussion that was had over the last 25 pages or so.  My own Rolex purchase was preceded by my moving through all 3 stages of thinking about Rolexes as mentioned by the forbes article posted here a while back.  In the end, prompted by a desire to own a watch with dual time zone functionality and the feeling that I could wear it anywhere, I ended up with an 116710.  Obligatory wrist shots below (please excuse the crappy phone pics):

 

 

 

On another note, I wanted to weigh in on the brand exclusive boutique business model that's been discussed recently.  I apologize in advance for the length and detail of this post.

Congrats on your GMT.  Great choice for a dual timezone watch!  Also very interesting evaluation of boutiques, pricing etc.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newcomer View Post


I definitely agree with most of what you said. And I guess a little bit of competition never hurt anyone, especially when the customer can make an informed decision based on various factors, i.e., price, service, relationship with the dealer, etc. I agree that there is never going to be a change in price structure that will create what I termed "an accurate reflection of value." Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

I guess what I said was a bit of a misnomer. Let me phrase it in the alternative. I wish there was a change in price structure such that there was not such a huge discrepancy between price and value. Perhaps some examples would illustrate better what I am attempting to say, because I feel like I may have been a bit cryptic (I blame it on the 'hurriedness' of my last post). I also think that the below analysis is better applied to the 'mid-level' luxury tier, perhaps the $4,000 - $10,000 range.

I think what I find perturbing is the huge discrepancy in what people pay. When one person walks out of an AD paying $3,500 for a watch with an MSRP of $5,000, and I walked out paying $4,500, I cannot help but feel that I was being swindled. I cannot help but wonder, "is $3,500 the lowest? Could the AD have been pushed to $3,000?" I find it a little bit confusing I guess. That is one aspect of Rolex's pricing structure that I really appreciate. I like the fact that most Rolex ADs do not discount. When I think of the Submariner, I automatically think of a watch that is $7,000. And honestly, I think it is appropriately valued at $7,000. I know that Rolex tends to get bashed for being overpriced, but I find satisfaction in knowing that I paid the same amount as everyone else did.

In contrast, I think Omega has some issues in this regard. The Speedmaster retails at about $4,500, and I bought mine for far less than $3,500 from a certain AD. That same AD had the new 8500 models for less than $4,000 retail. What does that say about how much the watch is actually worth, if both the AD, and the Manufacturer can profit off of an item that has already been discounted by ~25 percent? I am not saying that this pricing strategy is good, or bad... I am just saying that I find it a bit disconcerting.
 

 


For the sake of example, lets take IWC. The new Ingenieur is going to be retailing for, I believe, $6,600. This is a watch with a ETA 2892 movement, and has half the antimagnetic fortitude as its predecessor. I cannot help but wonder what is going into the watch that makes it $6,600. And yes, I know the standard refrain, veblen good, luxury market, etc. However, Cartier has come out with the Tank Solo XL with an ETA movement for $3,500, and in my opinion, is a brand with as great of a provenance as IWC. The JLC Master Control comes in at around $6,800, and features a wonderfully finished in-house movement, and is superbly finished. I guess I am just confused?

I think certain brands have begun to enact pricing structures that, although they do not accurately reflect the value of the watch, are certainly on their way to better reflecting the value of the watch. Brands like JLC, GO, and even Cartier, have really surprised me as of late. I think some of the upper tier are also 'fairly' priced. I wish that there was a little more transparency, less price variance (or more brand control), and less price gouging. As you noted... some of this is just plain greed. And I feel like it is not a good thing when your customers start to develop the perception of your brand as greedy. The problem, I guess, is that most of these brands are just not catering to 'WIS.'

There is a difference between strict pricing strategies and perceived value of an item. 

 

With regard to your discussion comparing Rolex's strict pricing vs. Omega and variations in price, I can see that everyone can feel good about getting the same deal for the same item.  You mention feeling swindled if you pay $4,500 for a watch and someone else got it for $3,500.  However, some of that can also be based on location.  I am going to presume a big name store with prime real estate in NYC will have much higher overhead (rent, taxes, insurance, etc) compared to dealer in a small city or in the suburbs of say Ohio.  Hence, would you feel swindled if you knew the dealer in Ohio could sell the watch to you for $3,500 but he decided to hold the line on price with other stores in NYC.  Hence his profit is now better than those of a NYC store?  To be honest, I've never bought a watch in NYC.  Great place to window shop, but unless I am buying a watch that I know no ADs discount, I've ALWAYS been able to get a much lower price buying from ADs in suburbs than any price a NYC AD gave me.  So if someone does their homework, or can get the name of an AD that has better pricing than some of the big stores, why shouldn't one be rewarded?  Just playing devils advocate.

 

As for your discussion regarding IWC vs. JLCs...that seems to be about perceived value and thats very subjective.  Is an IWC with a modified ETA movement worth as much as a JLC with an inhouse movement?  IMHO, not really, but others will say yes it is...even if its just because they like the design.  To me there is a big difference between essentially throwing an average movement in a case, doing a little movement decorating vs. building the entire watch and movement.  Other than style is an IWC Portugese Chrongraph that different from say a Monte Blanc Chronograph, or an old automatic Omega Speedmaster or any other watch powered by a Val 7750?  To me thats largely an issue of the value you personally assign to a watch.  Someone might value overall design more than the movement that they might rarely see or only see in photos.  My Dad actually went to an AD looking for an IWC, but ended up getting a JLC.  Why...because the sales person said, look IWC is a good product, but once you are spending a certain amount on a watch, a JLC is higher quality and you are getting a movement made in house rather than Valjoux 7750 with some slight mods (mostly in terms of decoration).

 

In the end, I think most buyers have purchased a watch for more than they should have, and gotten good deals on a few watches too.  However, the real measure of the value of a watch is how you feel after you've owned it for a while. Does it have the qualities that make it a keeper or does it lose its appeal once the newness wears off.  

post #18167 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by NonServiam View Post

Good reads on the last couple of pages! biggrin.gif

A touch of red today ... Old pic.

Klokkebilder598.jpg

Nice!
post #18168 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by mreister View Post

Hi all,

 

Thought I'd join in on the conversation finally, after reading (I think) the entirety of this thread and enjoying it immensely.  I particularly enjoyed the Rolex discussion that was had over the last 25 pages or so.  My own Rolex purchase was preceded by my moving through all 3 stages of thinking about Rolexes as mentioned by the forbes article posted here a while back.  In the end, prompted by a desire to own a watch with dual time zone functionality and the feeling that I could wear it anywhere, I ended up with an 116710.  

 

 

Welcome mreister!  It wasn't too long ago that I came out of lurking myself.  Thanks mainly to the intelligent, well-informed discussion via this thread (which I too read in its entirety) I ended up with a small collection which very much (I think) reflects my personal values and tastes. I own a couple of pieces from Rolex and I love 'em both!  Thanks for your modeling (spreadsheet, not catwalk) contributions, and looking forward to whatever you might share!

post #18169 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by NonServiam View Post

Good reads on the last couple of pages! biggrin.gif

A touch of red today ... Old pic.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Klokkebilder598.jpg

 

Excellent!!

 

Gotta Luv the Red.

post #18170 of 39048

Tonight's five to ten minutes worth of activity while waiting for a dryer full of clothes to finish a cycle.  Picked up my old DSLR (Canon T1i) and figuring out how to take a proper picture of one of my watches.  Wanted to highlight Patek's varying use of angles with the dial and subdials to enhance legibility while maintaining impeccable proportions with the fonts they use, the length of subdial hands and indicators, etc.  

 

 

 

Didn't quite accomplish my goal very well, I think.  Might be the low light evening environment (watch looks very different in the bright sunlight versus the yellow light in our living room).  The sapphire crystal is also picking up too much light by "12."  But, in any case, it's lovely to stare at this lovely platinum piece through the lens, and even lovelier to stare at it in person! 


I'll get this right at some point.  In the meantime, it's much, much easier to take great pictures of my daughters!  I just point and click, and 95% of the pics I take come out fantastic, no matter the lighting.  Clearly it's not because I'm a biased father, but because my daughters are far prettier and require much less "proper lighting" than any of the watches I own.  fistbump.gif

post #18171 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belligero View Post


—hat tip to No Frills

 

You, sir, are a gentleman and a scholar given your diligence with footnotes.

post #18172 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post

Tonight's five to ten minutes worth of activity while waiting for a dryer full of clothes to finish a cycle.  Picked up my old DSLR (Canon T1i) and figuring out how to take a proper picture of one of my watches.  Wanted to highlight Patek's varying use of angles with the dial and subdials to enhance legibility while maintaining impeccable proportions with the fonts they use, the length of subdial hands and indicators, etc.  

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

 

 

Didn't quite accomplish my goal very well, I think.  Might be the low light evening environment (watch looks very different in the bright sunlight versus the yellow light in our living room).  The sapphire crystal is also picking up too much light by "12."  But, in any case, it's lovely to stare at this lovely platinum piece through the lens, and even lovelier to stare at it in person! 


I'll get this right at some point.  In the meantime, it's much, much easier to take great pictures of my daughters!  I just point and click, and 95% of the pics I take come out fantastic, no matter the lighting.  Clearly it's not because I'm a biased father, but because my daughters are far prettier and require much less "proper lighting" than any of the watches I own.  fistbump.gif

Nice, very very nice.

post #18173 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post


I'll get this right at some point.  In the meantime, it's much, much easier to take great pictures of my daughters!  I just point and click, and 95% of the pics I take come out fantastic, no matter the lighting.  Clearly it's not because I'm a biased father, but because my daughters are far prettier and require much less "proper lighting" than any of the watches I own.  fistbump.gif

+1

post #18174 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post

Tonight's five to ten minutes worth of activity while waiting for a dryer full of clothes to finish a cycle.  Picked up my old DSLR (Canon T1i) and figuring out how to take a proper picture of one of my watches.   Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Wanted to highlight Patek's varying use of angles with the dial and subdials to enhance legibility while maintaining impeccable proportions with the fonts they use, the length of subdial hands and indicators, etc.   Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Didn't quite accomplish my goal very well, I think.  Might be the low light evening environment (watch looks very different in the bright sunlight versus the yellow light in our living room).  The sapphire crystal is also picking up too much light by "12."  But, in any case, it's lovely to stare at this lovely platinum piece through the lens, and even lovelier to stare at it in person! 
I'll get this right at some point.  In the meantime, it's much, much easier to take great pictures of my daughters!  I just point and click, and 95% of the pics I take come out fantastic, no matter the lighting.  Clearly it's not because I'm a biased father, but because my daughters are far prettier and require much less "proper lighting" than any of the watches I own.  fistbump.gif

fedex me your watch so i may take proper pics. ill send it back. promise.
post #18175 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post

 Wanted to highlight Patek's varying use of angles with the dial and subdials to enhance legibility while maintaining impeccable proportions with the fonts they use, the length of subdial hands and indicators,  The sapphire crystal is also picking up too much light by "12."  


I'll get this right at some point.  In the meantime, it's much, much easier to take great pictures of my daughters!  Clearly it's not because I'm a biased father, but because my daughters are far prettier and require much less "proper lighting" than any of the watches I own.  fistbump.gif

An absolutely beautiful watch! I love the subdials and Patek's use of depth with them.

My family photos always turn out better than my watch photos ...so I understand what you experienced.
post #18176 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post

 

Welcome mreister!  It wasn't too long ago that I came out of lurking myself.  Thanks mainly to the intelligent, well-informed discussion via this thread (which I too read in its entirety) I ended up with a small collection which very much (I think) reflects my personal values and tastes. I own a couple of pieces from Rolex and I love 'em both!  Thanks for your modeling (spreadsheet, not catwalk) contributions, and looking forward to whatever you might share!

Thank you - happy to be here.  After seeing some of the pics you posted earlier, I think everyone's better off if I leave the catwalk-style modeling to you!

post #18177 of 39048
Please recommend a good watch winder. Not price sensitive but I also don't want to spend half a fortune.
post #18178 of 39048
My new to me Speedy on Leffot's unlined cordovan strap. In love.
post #18179 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by whnay. View Post

Please recommend a good watch winder. Not price sensitive but I also don't want to spend half a fortune.

i dont know a ton about em, but i have heard only good things about orbita.
post #18180 of 39048
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post





I love that watch ... 3940 right? It is probably my 2nd favorite Patek, right behind the 5970.

I finally had the chance to catch up on this thread, great stuff guys! I hope everyone is doing good.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread