that is not the 176. the 176 is a 2 handed watch.
The Watch Appreciation Thread - Page 1179
post #17671 of 21134
2/3/13 at 2:09pm
Featured Stories on Styleforum
post #17672 of 21134
2/3/13 at 2:10pm
post #17673 of 21134
2/3/13 at 2:28pm
post #17674 of 21134
2/3/13 at 2:33pm
post #17675 of 21134
2/3/13 at 2:51pm
post #17678 of 21134
2/3/13 at 4:16pm
post #17679 of 21134
2/3/13 at 4:20pm
post #17680 of 21134
2/3/13 at 6:15pm
post #17681 of 21134
2/3/13 at 6:32pm
post #17682 of 21134
2/3/13 at 6:42pm
post #17683 of 21134
2/3/13 at 6:50pm
post #17684 of 21134
2/3/13 at 6:57pm
post #17685 of 21134
2/3/13 at 6:59pm














![nod[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/nod%5B1%5D.gif)
. I have a vintage IWC cal 89 (I'm guessing it's basically the portofino from the 1960s), and it's about 5mm smaller than the current Portofino. I like Breitling as well; I have 1 currently and about to get another one. They are some of the smallest men's Breitlings at 41mm and 42mm, yet they are still quite large. If they were chrono, they'd be larger/taller. Hopefully these brands will start dialing back the size of the watches. I think I like about 38-40mm.