Originally Posted by idfnl
Can we get a fact check on this one?
can you link the pic? im fairly well versed in spotting them.
*edit* nevermind...found the pic...ill do a quick rundown
the rehaut is so thin its almost invisible. Much thicker on the gen.
font on the date is WAY off
crown/lugs are a bit mis shapen
crown isnt nearly as sharp as gen
the engraving on the buckle is wrong. when you look at the gen buckle its much darker.
see how the "10" on the bezel is chipped off? ceramic doesnt chip.
bezel divots are too rounded
case is stamped 18K. on a stainless steel watch.
pearl is mis shapen.
back case ridges are far too rounded. should be VERY sharp and clean.
these are just a few things that stand out. If i could actually hold it, i could name a dozen more.Edited by DerekS - 12/26/12 at 10:23am