or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread - Page 977

post #14641 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai View Post

I had a Travel Time. It was a good looking watch, but the hands had the annoying habit of moving on their own because the buttons would get depressed by accident. It happened often enough that I couldn't trust the time on the watch, which is pretty much a watch's primary function. I ended up selling the watch and got more than I had paid for it (I bought it brand new from an AD.)

Hi Kai,

 

Either you had a bad example of a 5134, or you are really tough on your watches?  My Dad has never had any problems with his Travel Time with regard to buttons accidentally being depressed.  He thinks its one of the better Pateks he has owned. I've handled my Dad's Travel Time and based on button placement and the resistance the buttons have, it would be difficult to accidentally reset the time (at least on his) unless you hit it against something with a pretty good amount of force.  Sorry to hear your experience with it wasn't as good as my Dads ownership experience.  But as you pointed out, the nice thing is basically any Patek with a complication purchased 10 years ago is worth more than the buyer paid. 

 

Best regards,

Dino

post #14642 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino944 View Post

Hi Kai,

Either you had a bad example of a 5134, or you are really tough on your watches?  My Dad has never had any problems with his Travel Time with regard to buttons accidentally being depressed.  He thinks its one of the better Pateks he has owned. I've handled my Dad's Travel Time and based on button placement and the resistance the buttons have, it would be difficult to accidentally reset the time (at least on his) unless you hit it against something with a pretty good amount of force.  Sorry to hear your experience with it wasn't as good as my Dads ownership experience.  But as you pointed out, the nice thing is basically any Patek with a complication purchased 10 years ago is worth more than the buyer paid. 

Best regards,
Dino

I actually wasn't paying close enough attention.

I didn't have the 5134. I had the earlier model, the 5034 with the hobnail finish.

It looked like this (not my photo)
post #14643 of 35576
http://www.credor.com/video/6870/video.html

http://www.credor.com/lineup/node/gcaq995/

http://www.credor.com/lineup/node/

I buy watches as eagerly as I buy new cars, but this one is on the list for the eventual "nice silver/white/black strap very dressy watch" bucket. Along with the VC Traditionelle small-second manual, the PP 5196G, and (being a tad more practical), the Nomos 38mm Orion.
post #14644 of 35576
Thread Starter 
Can't say I'm a fan of those big floating numbers...
post #14645 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post

Can't say I'm a fan of those big floating numbers...

Normally, I wouldn't be that interested either-- and certainly don't like the ones that are really obvious. It happens, though, that they combine to produce the sail number of a boat I'm rather fond of. So if they whisper their identity, that's OK. A discreet monogram.

Somewhere, there's a Credor with a porcelain face that makes an even more subtle hint toward those numerals. For a lot more $$, though.
post #14646 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai View Post


I actually wasn't paying close enough attention.
I didn't have the 5134. I had the earlier model, the 5034 with the hobnail finish.
It looked like this (not my photo) Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

 

Hi Kai, thanks for clarifying that.  It probably explains some of the issues you had.  The 5134 has a completely different case and pusher design, than the earlier 5034.  Even if you weren't happy with its performance, at least you were able to sell it for more than you paid.   

post #14647 of 35576
heard back from my AD today. apparently, they lost the panerai line. then i heard from my boss that they also lost rolex and cartier. somebody is fucking with the wrong people.
post #14648 of 35576
Thread Starter 
They're following the same strategy as many Richemont and Swatch Group brands: rolling out own boutiques everywhere and de-emphasizing AD in those areas. It's amazing that there wasn't one Panerai boutique in the US six or seven years ago and that there's now 8, including 3 in Florida alone...
post #14649 of 35576
While not mine (or in my price range), I came across a few articles about Hajime Asaoka that were pretty interesting. Being self taught and based in Japan, I wonder if he will be able to break into the market successfully. Maybe some of the more experienced posters in the thread can provide insight/opinions.

http://www.hodinkee.com/hands-on-with-the-hajime-asaoka-tourbillon-1-high-end-independent-watchmaking-from-tokyo-japan
http://www.watchesbysjx.com/2012/08/a-new-watch-from-hajime-asaoka-with-16.html
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

post #14650 of 35576
interesting design, not bad looking, but a bit too art deco/batman gotham city/futuristic look for me.

as to whether the brand will catch on, only time will tell.
post #14651 of 35576
Today's watch (vintage Seiko chronograph with an alligator strap)


post #14652 of 35576

Love the vintage stuff myself.  Here's a 1952 solid 18K gold Vulcain.  Really love the understated elegance.

 

 


# VULCAIN50

post #14653 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManCrush View Post

Love the vintage stuff myself.  Here's a 1952 solid 18K gold Vulcain.  Really love the understated elegance.



# VULCAIN50


I like the lugs on this watch.
post #14654 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai View Post

I like the lugs on this watch.

+1. its like they are backwards. very cool.
post #14655 of 35576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino944 View Post

A very reasonable trade if it was an inhouse movement 116520 Daytona. Not a such a good trade if it was Daytona 16520 with Zenith based movement.
Lets see some pix!

I haven't gotten the watch in my possession yet, but will post pics when I do. It was the 116520 Daytona with F serial. The sub wasn't in great shape, prolly 88% by TZ standards, kind of a throw in. It was a blue date I got used ages ago and has probably 2-3 years of actual wrist time on it from me.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread