or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread - Page 887

post #13291 of 34748
Thanks guys. I tried on a number of different straps and the Di-Modell was the only one that really caught my eye.
post #13292 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by EMY View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino944 View Post

 Emy's watch is proof you can scratch the hell out of a Rolex if you beat on it. 

The watch is noticeably scratched, but I think the harsh lighting made it even more apparent. In normal lighting, it's not as bad as it looks.


for 75.00 I could have it looking almost new. You should be able to do the same in any city.....

post #13293 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampton View Post

This is the way to do it guys, epic

 


That is good, what is it? Rolex what?

post #13294 of 34748
Explorer I 36mm
post #13295 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampton View Post

This is the way to do it guys, epic


One of Rolex's best piece IMO
post #13296 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by depechedior View Post

ae7074ba-0247-6503.jpgae7074ba-029d-b841.jpg/quote]

That's about a good as it gets IMHO.
post #13297 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampton View Post

This is the way to do it guys, epic

 

 

This is awesome. 

post #13298 of 34748
That red NATO on the Explorer really was a great idea. I wish that they had not replaced the 36mm Explorer. Then again, I am of the belief that the Explorer has become progressively worse since its first iteration. Now it just looks confused.
post #13299 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newcomer View Post

That red NATO on the Explorer really was a great idea. I wish that they had not replaced the 36mm Explorer. Then again, I am of the belief that the Explorer has become progressively worse since its first iteration. Now it just looks confused.


I am with you.  This was a great design (the movement is another story) that ended up ruined by Rolex.  The 42mm design is a crime, IMHO.

post #13300 of 34748
The current iteration of the Explorer I is 39mm; it keeps the same classic looks, but is simply sized up a bit. 42mm would be the Explorer II. I have to say that while too large for my tastes, they did a nice job with the case and lug design.

The real travesty is the newest redesign of the Submariner - it ruined the aestetics of an iconic watch. The larger squared lugs can only be described as horrendous; they give the watch a pseudo-square shape and fail to flow into the bracelet. Taking a look at the new version side by side with a classic piece leaves little doubt to which is more pleasing.
post #13301 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazman70k View Post

Here's a challenge for you then...
standard.jpg
Black seal compass strap on 183.

is that the strap with the back piece sewn on? or is it the kind that you run through the loops? (does that make any sense??)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NonServiam View Post

Lovely 5711! Here a sideview of my Nautilus, with pushers satisfied.gif
DSC_3752.jpg

wow. fantastic
post #13302 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazman70k View Post


Good commentary.
But here's a Unitas based Panerai that I treasure.
medium800.jpg
And worn by the late Stefano Bemer while he showed me leather clicking.
medium800.jpg

 

As long as you are happy with it thats what matters.  As for it being worn by Stefano Bemer, its nice if that matters to you.  Someone else buying or wearing something is rarely a selling point to me.
 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hampton View Post

This is the way to do it guys, epic

 

 

Looks great!  A very classic looking Rolex.  I just sold mine, as it hadn't gotten much wrist time in recent years, so it took a bit of the sting out of the price of my last watch purchase.  Still when I see photos of the Ex1 I can't help but think what a great looking watch!

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOCKBA View Post

The current iteration of the Explorer I is 39mm; it keeps the same classic looks, but is simply sized up a bit. 42mm would be the Explorer II. I have to say that while too large for my tastes, they did a nice job with the case and lug design.
The real travesty is the newest redesign of the Submariner - it ruined the aestetics of an iconic watch. The larger squared lugs can only be described as horrendous; they give the watch a pseudo-square shape and fail to flow into the bracelet. Taking a look at the new version side by side with a classic piece leaves little doubt to which is more pleasing.

 

As someone that owned the last version of the 36mm Explorer 1, to be honest I don't care for the new 39mm model.  To me the dial with the solid white gold numerals looks clumsy and I just don't think the size is an improvement for that model.  If someone really needs a time only model at roughly 30-40 mm they could always go with the Milgauss. 

 

As for the new Sub, I don't mind the squared shoulders (same as on the current GMTs).  I'll admit its a little bulkier looking but I don't think its too bad.  I own a last generation Sub date that I like a lot and I wouldn't mind owning a new Sub.  I wouldn't sell the Sub I own to get one, but its still a good looking watch.  Personally, I'm not pleased with the Deep Sea Sea Dweller, and my feelings about the new Ex2 are mixed.  Both would have benefitted from a slightly wider bracelet.  The Ex2 isn't quite as bad since its lugs taper a bit, but both look a bit too large for the bracelet they are on.  Its as the Rolex said, he we spent all this money on the case and some other changes, but they ran out of money once they reached the bracelet so they gave people the same bracelet that is on the smaller Sub and GMT.  To me, the bracelets for the Deep Sea and Ex2 are not really properly proportioned for the watches they are holding.

post #13303 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekS View Post

is that the strap with the back piece sewn on? or is it the kind that you run through the loops? (does that make any sense??)
wow. fantastic


The back leather is sewn on, making it near impossible to put on a 183.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino944 View Post

As long as you are happy with it thats what matters.  As for it being worn by Stefano Bemer, its nice if that matters to you.  Someone else buying or wearing something is rarely a selling point to me.

He is wearing my watch. smile.gif

As for what you buy, its your own perogative. But if in house movement is your thing, here's something you may appreciate.

large.jpg
post #13304 of 34748

^ that is nice, very nice.

post #13305 of 34748
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazman70k View Post


The back leather is sewn on, making it near impossible to put on a 183.
He is wearing my watch. smile.gif
As for what you buy, its your own perogative. But if in house movement is your thing, here's something you may appreciate.
large.jpg

 

Very nice!  Thank you for sharing the photo. 

 

Although, I should point out, I'm not someone who is only interested in watches with inhouse movements.  If you look at your earlier post which I think is #13,287 and read the last 2 paragraphs of mine that you quoted...you will see my issue with Panerai has not been their use of outsourced movements, instead it has been with their choice of sources. 

 

I actually have several brands of watches with base movements outsourced from companies such as F.Piguet, JLC, Piaget, and Zenith. 

 

Oh, and thank you for clarifying that he was wearing your watch fing02[1].gif

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread