or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 2776  

post #41626 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachshund View Post

I'm calling 'bullshit' on the $17k Apple watch. I doubt I'm alone.

post #41627 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigerpac View Post

^Nice choices of course

but especially love the oxblood strap.  Something different that should be used waaaay more often imo.
that's why I did it icon_gu_b_slayer[1].gif
post #41628 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfluous View Post

All three of these are watches I previously circled as pure dress watches I'd want. Perhaps a slightly different A. Lange model (Richard Lange), but strange coincidence anyway. I guess you have good taste.
The richard lange is an awesome lange. It looks exactly identical to another watch I have so I passed. I'd love the Referenzuhr - have you considered that one tony?
post #41629 of 48312
The apple watch is ridiculously priced!

Always go mechanical for me. Anyway sharing some of my collection:

e87d75239bf41c37e54a35b2813116c0.jpg

a20b5ec1fc9646158a91c32148434203.jpg

b49e9bdd34d1d3e4a15ec6eb5a5c1eec.jpg

e8bc236825d79be641f0d48c3996cad2.jpg

0d12dc276236427f66383919a95210de.jpg

94605eb17c50af9f43b87b9927ebd134.jpg




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
post #41630 of 48312
I really like your choices, Jin.
post #41631 of 48312

That Glashütte looks marvelous!

post #41632 of 48312

Thanks Mr. Moo and ShawnBC!

post #41633 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic37 View Post

Hi all. Thought I'd share some of the collection. I enjoy looking all the time, so I figured I would put some up myself. More to come, if you are interested! 

More than a couple of those Rolexes are fake. I would talk to whoever sold you those...
post #41634 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by djh View Post


More than a couple of those Rolexes are fake. I would talk to whoever sold you those...

I'm sorry, but you're incorrect. 

post #41635 of 48312

I don't doubt that the Apple watch will sell. Even the model carrying a $9,600 premium for exclusivity alone (assuming there's about 50 bucks worth of gold in it).

 

In its current state, I think we'll mostly agree that the gold Apple Watch is a rather shameless status symbol given that it does little more than duplicate a subset the functions of the other three portable computers Apple users often carry around (Macbook, iPad, iPhone). Makes sense why Apple feel China is the largest market for it. Of course, all high-end watches are status symbols at some level. But at least mechanical watches can, to an extent, be justified as art. We can look through a display back entranced at the precise heartbeat of a balance spring; admire the many hand-machined and often painstakingly decorated components; ponder the heritage of a given complication...

 

I imagine owning one of these smart watches would add to the paradox of choice. "Should I reach all the way in my pocket and unlock my phone, or is the text message short enough for the Apple Watch's shorthand texting app?" I'm looking to reduce the electronics in my life, not find myself "needing" every new device on the market. I did actually spot a Samsung smart watch on my friend's young door man earlier this winter and asked him about it. He seemed quite passionate about it and said he enjoys how it decreases how often he has to interact with his cell phone. And there was some sort of walkie talkie app that seemed interesting.

 

Now I, and many here among us, generally won't wear anything on the wrist that can't charge itself (or require just a bit of simple winding). But the deep appreciation of tiny, labor-intensive, mechanical works of art is increasingly lost to the younger generations of digital natives. And with the economy as it is, many more yet can't see a mechanical watch as anything but an outdated device, the function of which has easily been replaced by half a dozen devices in any room, and one or two in the pocket. For that sort, a watch offering a platform for 21st century functionality at the wrist will probably be a breath of fresh air. It doesn't do much now. But it will, in time.

 

I kind of get it, even if I'm not going to buy one of these any time soon. But if, somewhere in the future, Seiko figured out how to power the onboard computer with a mechanical movement and created some techno-hybrid Reverso with an analogue COSC certified side.... well THAT I would probably find hard to ignore.

post #41636 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by djh View Post

More than a couple of those Rolexes are fake. I would talk to whoever sold you those...

I thought the same thing, even though I make no claims at being an expert from looking at users photos. Still...
post #41637 of 48312
All, maybe? I'm certainly no expert. But the VC and RO are fishy too!

Maybe this was going to evolve into a sales pitch "indistinguishable from the real thing for only 99.99+p&p"...not happening!
post #41638 of 48312
I'm certain I recall seeing a high-end cellphone which had a mechanical watch movement in it which was wound when you opened and shut the case - so the thing worked as a normal cellphone but it had an integrated mechanical watch with a natty winding mechanism. I don't think the mechanism recharged the phone battery - that would be highly unlikely. Quite neat, but of course in five or so years the cellphone part will be obsolete and you're left with, at best, an impractical and cumbersome pocketwatch.
post #41639 of 48312
+ in fairness to the OP, can those calling 'fake' point out a few reasons why. Just interests me that someone new pops up with a raft of high-end watches and a few more well-established voices immediately call him on it. I'm certainly no expert and the photos are quite rough.
post #41640 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShawnBC View Post

I don't want to be the one to ask, but are your watches genuine? Certainly the pearl looks odd (misplaced) on that Submariner, plus the dial logo and bezel insert. 

If I'm mistaken, then I apologize, just thought I'd ask.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachshund View Post

+ in fairness to the OP, can those calling 'fake' point out a few reasons why. Just interests me that someone new pops up with a raft of high-end watches and a few more well-established voices immediately call him on it. I'm certainly no expert and the photos are quite rough.

I'm no expert either, but I could've sworn there was another photo with a sub (which ShawnBC refers to in his above-quoted post) which now seems to have been deleted. That one was definitely fishy to me. Also, on the TT RO, the screws are all misaligned. My 15400 and all other pictures of ROs I've seen have screws aligned regularly around the bezel.

The date font on the day-date also looks odd, but there may be some vintage thing going on I'm not aware of.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)