or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 276  

post #4126 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singular View Post


/M

Elegant classic understated
post #4127 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by artoftime View Post
Elegant classic understated

Agreed. Hard to believe Those words can be in the same sentence as Audemars Piguet
post #4128 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidicboy View Post

VC Patrimony Traditionnelle Manuel


yes
post #4129 of 48312
+1 on that yes to the VC
post #4130 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post
I'm happy that OP finally came out with a 42mm of the Radiomir - it's such a perfect case and dial design but the 45mm size can't work for everyone's wrist.

I'm bothered by the position and proportions of the seconds subdial so I'm eagerly awaiting the base version of that one.

yes, and afaik the case is thinner than the old radiomirs too.

the subdial, it is a throwback to the original subdial position, yes?
post #4131 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinsongreen68 View Post
have to agree with this- finally got the explorer but have grown a little disenchanted with it. its to do with the size and lack of, for want of a better word, solidity. i had got used to wearing the speedmaster and that does feel like a lot more watch, the whole construction feels better, the rolex is almost tinny by comparison. the explorer is still a good watch but not worth the money when you consider the other options out there IMO.

All understandable comments. I agree that the price is a joke. For a stamped bracelet clasp??? Pfffttt. Still, it grew on me. I wear it more than my Speedy.
post #4132 of 48312
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidicboy View Post
yes, and afaik the case is thinner than the old radiomirs too.

the subdial, it is a throwback to the original subdial position, yes?

Not really - there were no vintage PAMs with the Radiomir cushion case with seconds hand but the vintage Panerai (6152, Egiziano) with seconds subdials always had it next to the 9, not eating it.




Then in the Vendome era, the first Radiomir with seconds dial was introduced (PAM 62) and it kept the 9 on the dial as well:




The Luminor cased modern PAMs (pre and post-Vendome) opted for a seconds subdial that was very harmoniously placed all the way instead of the 9 and keeping the balance of the dial pretty well. I like the Marina dial:




Things started to go weird about the seconds dial placement with the new Radiomir line started with PAM 183 and especially PAM 190. Now the subdial was placed in an awkward place that looks IMO out of balance. That's why I never bought the 190 although I thought it was the watch I had been waiting for for a long time



These are generally due to the case size vs. movement layout and the position of the seconds wheel and pinion on the movement. IMO, OP has been lazy and could have modified the movements (only takes 2 tiny wheels) to preserve the original aesthetics of the dial.

I much prefer the seconds subdial on the PAM 62 above.
post #4133 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post
Then in the Vendome era, the first Radiomir with seconds dial was introduced (PAM 62) and it kept the 9 on the dial as well:



I much prefer the seconds subdial on the PAM 62 above.

The 62 is probably the favorite of my PAMs now, but I hesitated when I first got it because of the seconds subdial placement. It grew on me.
post #4134 of 48312
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zippyh View Post
The 62 is probably the favorite of my PAMs now, but I hesitated when I first got it because of the seconds subdial placement. It grew on me.

Yes - it's a very nice watch. Not a huge fan of having the date there but I guess it's OK. I have been hoping for a long time for a version of the 62 in steel w/o date and in 42mm. I think we may be getting close with the new Radiomirs - but not close enough yet.

Another thing I've been waiting for a while is a very simple uncomplicated version of the PAM127 in a 44mm case. I would get that
post #4135 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post
The Luminor cased modern PAMs (pre and post-Vendome) opted for a seconds subdial that was very harmoniously placed all the way instead of the 9 and keeping the balance of the dial pretty well.

I agree and I think that the subdial helps balance the large crown protector on a Luminor.

On a Radiomir with it's smaller crown I much prefer a base dial.

Btw, sometimes when I look at my 177 I dislike the difference between the white seconds hand and the black hour and minutes hands and I have considered changing them all to the metal hands they use on the automatic models.

Thoughts?
post #4136 of 48312
Thread Starter 
I wouldn't do it personally. I'm like the black hands. If it really bothers you you can have the seconds hand painted by Jack at IWW or some other mod guy. I think it will look bad but that can be done.
post #4137 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post
If it really bothers you you can have the seconds hand painted by Jack at IWW or some other mod guy. I think it will look bad but that can be done.
No, I wouldn't do that (if the seconds hand was black it would almost disappear).

As it only annoys me sometimes, I'm not sure I'll do anything about it. I checked with my local AD and they could sell me the new hands and do the swap for about $100, which was cheaper than I had expected.

AFAIK, the (white) metal hands are all shiny, so they might clash with my ti (but then they use these on the automatic ti modesl, so it may not be an issue).

Anyway, thanks for your thoughts.
post #4138 of 48312
WHAT ARE YOU GUYS DEALING AND CAN I GET IN ON IT?!

My minuscule contribution:



I've been wanting to get a nice watch with alligator strap in black or brown in the realms of $1000 (actual price not retail). Any advice?
post #4139 of 48312


/M
post #4140 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by zjpj83 View Post

Stunning!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)