Recent Images In This Thread
- brandCartiertagged by Murlsquirl, 2/28/15
- itemIWC Portuguese Automatic Steel Blue Mens Watch IW500107tagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryJewelry Watchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
- brandLeatherfoottagged by GauchoSF, 7/29/13
- itemNEVER WORN ROLEX SUBMARINER MENS WATCH 116619LBtagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- brandRolextagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryWatchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
Related Forum Threads
- The Watch Appreciation Thread - Part two (Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, Jaeger... Last post on Today at 6:11 am in Classic Menswear
- Top 5 sports watches under $1000 - a contest! Last post on 10/31/14 at 10:51am in Classic Menswear
- Men's watch at the $5K mark? Last post on 4/5/14 at 6:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Sub-$150 daily beater watch Last post on 7/18/16 at 4:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Poor man's watch thread Last post on 12/4/16 at 6:45am in Classic Menswear
The 5 Best Dress Watches Under $5,000 - as Voted by Styleforum!
Last edited: 2/2/16
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?Last edited: 2/8/16
- The 5 best Sport Watches under $1000 - as voted by Styleforum!Last edited: 2/2/16
- Allen Edmonds
- The Armoury
- Batch Mens
- Craftsman Clothing
- David Fin
- Drinkwater's Cambridge
- Equus Leather
- Exquisite Trimmings
- Falcon Garments
- Freemans Sporting Club
- A Fine Pair of Shoes
- H. Stockton
- Gentlemen's Footwear
- The Hanger Project
- Henry Blake
- H.N. White
- House of Kydos
- John Elliott
- Kent Wang
- Khaki's of Carmel
- Luxire Custom Clothing
- Meermin Mallorca
- MILER Menswear
- Need Supply Co.
- No Man Walks Alone
- Pierpont Leather
- Portland Dry Goods
- Proper Cloth
- Ring Jacket
- S.E.H Kelly
- Self Edge
- Spier & Mackay
- Standard & Strange
- Suspension Point
- Taylor Stitch
- Uncle Otis
- Vanda Fine Clothing
- Virtual Clotheshorse
- Yellow Hook Necktie
- Your MadeInItaly
The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 2741post #41101 of 483122/17/15 at 6:29pmpost #41102 of 483122/17/15 at 6:38pmQuote:
Ah, my friend it has taken me nearly 44 years to perfect this level of craziness, not to mention it runs in my family. My father is huge on overcompensating and buying a new item if something gets dented, stained, or damaged. My wife usually tells her friends, she considers herself lucky that I'm only half as crazy as my father.
Interesting... I guess with the screw down crown I presumed it had greater water resistance.Quote:
Most watches that are water resistant to 100m or more, DO have a screw down crown. The bulk (but not all) watches without a screw down crown tend to be water resistant to 30m.
I know a person that swam with a Cartier Santos, no screw down crown, water resistant to 30m and they had not realized the crown was pulled in the out position and nothing happened. IIRC, I read in one article that when the Royal Oak was designed, it was designed so that it is water resistant even if the crown is open or not in place. In the end,for me, whether a watch goes swimming isn't merely a function of water resistance, but also how costly it is. Why chance it with a really expensive watch. Granted the phrase really expensive is relative, to one person it means Rado, to another a Rolex, to another its a Patek.Quote:Originally Posted by tifosi
That's what I'm trying to figure out. I plan to get the RO 15450 and it is 50m with a screw down crown. I really want to be able to swim with it. I guess just wading in a pool with it would be fine, but I probably wouldn't take it in the ocean. Guess I'll have to hang onto my Explorer to take on vacations.
50M is more than adequate to go swimming. Until sometime in the 1980s, all Rolex watches with the exception of Sub and SDs were only water resistant to 50m. Plenty of DJs, GMTs, and other Rolex watches went swimming without any problems.
You could certainly take it in the Ocean to swim, but I wouldn't go scuba diving with it. However, to be honest I wouldn't wear any watch in water that I could not easily replace. Underwater seems pretty and harmless, but that is often where lots of scuffs, scrapes, and dings take place...due to coral, sand, or even the rough surface around the edges of a swimming pool (miss judge the edge of a pool as you come up out of the water and BAM...that RO bezel has a nasty ding). My Explorer II got a few nasty scuffs when swimming...so its the only watch I'd take swimming. My RO, will never see the inside of a pool or ocean...its just not worth the risk to me. Hell, I don't even want to bang up my other fancier Rolex watches underwater...but that's just me.post #41103 of 483122/17/15 at 7:07pmQuote:Originally Posted by aleksandr
The Nautilus has never quite appealed to me. I know they probably share some DNA, but I feel the Royal Oak just does everything.. better. I tried on a friend's 5711 recently and it felt overall quite meh to me. At least it looks better than an Aquanaut though..
Besides, I paid significantly less for my 15400 than my friend did for his 5711 - the difference is enough to buy a sub with some cash leftover
The RO and the Nautilus tend to both be love them or hate them watches. Some people think the RO is too industrial looking and ugly, and they weren't initially a sales success. A lot of brands thought the RO was too expensive and was a gamble that would put AP out of business. We now know they were wrong.
Another guy I know is not a Nautilus fan and says, to him they look like old TVs from the 1950s. In fact, the real old school Patek collector/Patek Snobs in the 1970s through the 90s thought the Nautilus was an ugly entry level Patek hardly worthy of the Calatrava Cross. The Nautilus used to langish in ADs show cases for ages. Real interest in them only took off when there were rumors in the early 2000s that Patek was no longer going to make steel watches, and the Nautilus was going out of production. We all now know that didn't happen...they just revised the size and came out with the 3712 which became the 5712 and then there was the 5711 and a whole family of spin offs.
I've said it before, but out of luxury sports watches that I looked at before buying my RO, the only watch on par with the RO's fit and finish was the Nautilus. All other watches were a step down. I like the Nautilus, but felt the thinness of the bracelet felt a tad dainty even next to the thin bracelet of the RO ultrathin 15202. So I questioned whether it would wear well as a daily wearer (although through Frills we can see it can live a very active life). Beyond that, I've always preferred the looks of the RO to the Nautilus. So as mentioned, I like the Nautilus and wouldn't mind having one in my collect with a RO...but it would never be instead of a RO.
I can definitely see that allure of a 15400 plus still having enough left for a Sub and some extra cash. Pricing is closer on the 15202 and the 5711 so no free Sub for me ...but I do love my RO even without the free Sub
I've never been an Aquanaut fan.post #41104 of 483122/17/15 at 9:53pmQuote:Originally Posted by pgtownsyou
I just picked up this watch that I've become pretty fond of. I've really been liking the mesh bands lately. warning (Click to show)
Enjoy! My first good watch was an ESQ. I still have it
I love every Dino post I have ever read.post #41105 of 483122/18/15 at 1:13amScrew down crowns do nothing on their own to make a watch more watertight; i.e. cranking down hard on them won't have any effect on the sealing. It'll just wear the parts out faster and get things stuck, so go easy on the torque, guys.
The main benefit of locking things down using a threaded fastener is that it relieves the stem and seals of applied forces on the crown. An additional plus is that the crown is reliably fixed into position, but it's definitely possible to have a diver's watch without this design.
The Vulcain Nautical is good for 300 m, and neither the pusher nor the setting crown screw down. The lower crown does, but that's just to prevent it from moving around once it's set. It's designed to be operated underwater to calculate the times for decompression stops while you're actually diving. Same deal with the main (non-screw-down) crown and pusher; back in the day, you were meant to fiddle with the alarm via those bits while diving to let you know when your bottom time and decompression stops were done. Some people get all paranoid about operating pushers underwater, but it was fine in 1961 and it's still fine now. You can even operate the chronograph on your Daytona while you're in the water if you want; I have.
photo of my watch by @loevhagen
The decompression table and alarm will still do their job, of course, but it's highly unlikely that anyone uses them as a primary safety system any more now that there are dive computers.post #41106 of 483122/18/15 at 2:10amQuote:Quote:
Thanks. But there has to be a term for this, right? @Dino944?post #41107 of 483122/18/15 at 2:22am^
I've seen that Duomètre dial referred to as "grained", "parchment" and "eggshell". Personally, I'd go with "eggshell".
"Grained" is too general of a term, and this one's more what I'd call "parchment":
Although if you really think about it, any term from the business card scene in American Psycho would be applicable. "Bone", anyone?post #41108 of 483122/18/15 at 3:28amQuote:Originally Posted by Belligero
photo of my watch by @loevhagen
Very interesting watch. Where is the strap from? Looks similar to the one on the JLC Deep Sea. I've been considering something like that for my Speedy.post #41109 of 483122/18/15 at 3:30ampost #41110 of 483122/18/15 at 3:53am
+ 1, although the word "automatic" bugs me a little. I think a few months ago someone else showed some pics of a variation on this model, which were truly stunning. Can someone remind me what the model is? Dammit, every time I look at this thread I add another watch to my 'to do' list.post #41111 of 483122/18/15 at 4:30amQuote:Originally Posted by Dachshund
+ 1, although the word "automatic" bugs me a little. I think a few months ago someone else showed some pics of a variation on this model, which were truly stunning. Can someone remind me what the model is? Dammit, every time I look at this thread I add another watch to my 'to do' list.
It's a GP "Vintage 1960" chrono, powered by (if I remember correctly), an ETA-derived movement with a Dubois-Depraz 2030 chrono module on top, the same as the late 1990s - early 2000s Omega Dynamic twin-register chrono.
I think that the GP "Vintage 1960" came out in the mid-2000s which is, shockingly, 10 years ago now.
I remember that a local shop had one with a rose gold case and an ivory dial that looked really nice. However, I already had the Omega Dynamic so I managed to resist the temptation to get the GP and saved my money, even though the GP was more formal/dressier. Also, I wasn't really a fan of the cushion-shaped case on the GP at the time, although I've come to like the shape more over the intervening years. It just looked too 1960s - 1970s at the time which, of course, was precisely the point with the GP, given its name.post #41112 of 483122/18/15 at 4:36ampost #41113 of 483122/18/15 at 6:03am
A lot going on in TWAT overnight! A couple comments:
1. Why does the Grand Seiko use so many fonts and sizes? That is what bugs me about them and I am not a fan of the designs I have seen though I haven't looked too in depth at them.
2. Kia and Hyundai have made pretty expensive cars to rival the Germans but you don't see many of them. LeBron James isn't even helping with the Kia9000 or whatever it is called.
3. That GP dial is nice.post #41114 of 483122/18/15 at 6:17am1. Because they have no background in making true high-end luxury watches and lack the nuanced attention to detail that some others have. They make $200 watches that are sold in Macy's. That is their sweet spot.
2. Rival is a relative term.
3. Agreed!post #41115 of 483122/18/15 at 6:36am
This thread is locked
- The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?
- › OFFICIAL President Trump Thread 18 seconds ago
- › SPIER & MACKAY - Official Affiliate Thread 1 minute ago
- › Truman Boots 1 minute ago
- › The Uniqlo Thread 1 minute ago
- › John Elliott - official affiliate thread 1 minute ago
- › The official thrift/discount store bragging thread - Part II... 4 minutes ago
- › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2016 - News, Pictures, Sizing,... 5 minutes ago
- › Scent/Fragrance of the Day thread 6 minutes ago
- › Styleforum's "Just what Santa should have brought" Viberg GMTO... 7 minutes ago
- › The What Are You Wearing Today (WAYWT) Discussion Thread, Part II 7 minutes ago
- › Alden #907 Straight Tip Bal Calfskin by smfdoc
- › Allen Edmonds Leeds 2.0 Derby Men's Shoes Size US 10 D Walnut... by Lobster33
- › Dr. Martens Unisex Original 10 Eye Steel Toe Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Chippewa Men's Super Logger Waterproof Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Mosey Life Working Girl Travel Laptop Tote by sprout2
- › Allen Cox Brief trunks by sprout2
- › Sutor Mantellassi Men's C 567 Oxford by sprout2
- › Alden Burgundy Shell Cordovan Longwing by smfdoc
- › Alden Black Shell Cordovan Plain Toe by smfdoc
- › Florsheim Vincent Wingtip Oxford by smfdoc
- › Fashion Forward brands that will be big in
- › Five Menswear Trends for Fall
- › Don’t “Just Buy a New One”,...
- › Why Pay Such A Premium For Sunspel Or James...
- › In the Details: Lucian Föhr
- › A Sunday Drive: Styleforum Spring GMTOs
- › Should I dryclean my jeans, and if not, how...
- › The 5 Most-Hyped Handbags of the Moment
- › Eight Vignettes in Search of a (Wedding) Theme
- › The Kent Wang Cufflink Giveaway