or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 2720  

post #40786 of 48312
^^ NSFW!
post #40787 of 48312
That needs a spoiler tag. Not for the faint of heart.
post #40788 of 48312
Opinions on the Patek 5119R (Rose Gold)? It looks really good, and I think the bezel would help mask scratches. However, 36mm is a bit small. Thoughts?

2144413gross.jpg?v=0





Particularly in comparison to A Lange Richard Lange


10n6q8g.jpg
post #40789 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfluous View Post

Opinions on the Patek 5119R (Rose Gold)? It looks really good, and I think the bezel would help mask scratches. However, 36mm is a bit small. Thoughts?

2144413gross.jpg?v=0





Particularly in comparison to A Lange Richard Lange


10n6q8g.jpg
Both are nice but I greatly prefer the Patek on aesthetic grounds (I don't know anything about the movements). But I recall Dino mentioning issues with the sturdiness of the Patek lugs on that model.

In general, Roman numeral dials don't appeal to me because they can seem crowded and clumsy - the Calatrava is an example of one done beautifully that I really like. It is cleaner than the Lange which is more cluttered with the minute track and the stepped dial.

One thing I noticed is that neither flips the numerals for 4-8 to vertical. I always look for that, but mostly out of curiosity as I can't decide whether I prefer the numerals flipped or not.
post #40790 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by zippyh View Post

narcissistic here!
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


a bit late to the game but DAMN!! Zippy, you killed it. Amazing collection.
post #40791 of 48312

It bothers me that the Roman's on both dials for 4 are wrong.  Why not use IV?

post #40792 of 48312
Hopefully you would "baby" either one of them, with all of the love and care that they deserve....but between those two, I think I'd choose the Lange myself. That's mainly based on dial, I guess. It just seems a little more fresh somehow.

Never did love the Patek hobnail, and there are some other Calatavas I'd rather own than that particular model. (*5196J for instance).

But hey, they're both great, heirloom-quality dress watches.

Good luck!
post #40793 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbarwick View Post
 

It bothers me that the Roman's on both dials for 4 are wrong.  Why not use IV?

Isn't IIII the "watchmaker's four" or something? Thought I read that somewhere. 

post #40794 of 48312
Talking about babies I wonder what the offspring of zippyh's Bangkok sandwich would look like.
post #40795 of 48312

36mm is too small for me but I'm 6'1'' 225 lbs so it might work for you.  Give or take, 38 is really the lower limit for me.  

The Patek also suffers from tiny movement for the case size syndrome imo.  The sub seconds are jammed way up towards the center of the dial.  Hobnail is a bit stuffy too.

 

Still, a beautiful and classic watch of course.  Just not for me.

 

 

 

I like the Richard Lange more, still less dressy and therefore more versatile and also in a modern size of 40mm.  Finishing is amazing on the movement, a step better than their lower level stuff like the 1815 but is largestly covered by the 3/4 plate, which some people love.  I don't particularly like it, other than its historical connotations, because it covers up a lot of the beautiful movement.  

 

Nevertheless, between the two I'd pick the Richard Lange.

post #40796 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by tifosi View Post

Isn't IIII the "watchmaker's four" or something? Thought I read that somewhere. 
I read that somewhere too. Aesthetically IIII balances better with the VIII.
post #40797 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by dopey View Post

But I recall Dino mentioning issues with the sturdiness of the Patek lugs on that model.
 

+1

 

I'm not a fan of the hobnail on the Patek, however it will hide scratches better than a smooth bezel.  However, I suppose if you accidentally ding the bezel, there is nothing they can do to fix it.  Sometimes on a smooth bezel if its not too deep it can be polished.

 

However, my reason for not favoring that Patek are the lugs, which as Dopey recalls I have mentioned them not being very sturdy.  I was in a Patek dealer once when an owner was bringing that same model in with the lug broken clean off from accidental contact with a door frame.  When the guy left the dealer told me its rather common with that model and it can be soldered back on, but it will likely happen again so he wouldn't recommend that model or style of case and lug from Patek.  

 

For that reason the Lange would be my choice between those 2.  Good luck with whatever you decide.

post #40798 of 48312
Might be worth considering Vacheron? I prefer the Lange out of those 2, but don't love the roman numerals.
post #40799 of 48312

I like them both..the sub seconds on the Calatrava is so delicate.  It really is extremely pretty.  But my heart belongs to the Lange - in platinum.  I'm slightly biased not just because I love Lange, but because I've played with that one in person more than once, and it's become a grail for me.

post #40800 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by culverwood View Post

Talking about babies I wonder what the offspring of zippyh's Bangkok sandwich would look like.

 

Maybe?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)