or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 2604  

post #39046 of 48312
It really is about time for you to post pictures of your entire collection. Do it. Now.
post #39047 of 48312
+1

Always in favor of more pr0n!

I'd settle for at least some partial views, group shots, etc.
post #39048 of 48312

Nomos: Clean designs and great value. I also love that they moved more parts in-house and kept prices the same. I find a majority of their range extremely attractive. Very few I would turn away, but outside of the Weltzeit, nothing blows me away either. They are just really nice watches that I like.

 

Lange: Outside of the Datograph, I like all of their lines. Their movement design and finishing are my personal favorites among any manufacture. The 1815 lineup is where my heart is for Lange though. They basically make up my entire grail list.

 

FP Journe: So this one just kind of snuck up there this year. The more I got a chance to handle and see these in person, the more I fell in love with the brands. Dial design, hands, and movement designs are just fantastic.

Honorable Mention Rolex: This would have made my list above Journe, but I just find the new Sub and GMT cases displeasing aesthetically. I've tried multiple times to come around on them, but I just can't.

post #39049 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

It really is about time for you to post pictures of your entire collection.
Too garish for TWAT, I'm afraid. Not to mention, poorly chosen.shog[1].gif
post #39050 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tried and True View Post

Too garish for TWAT, I'm afraid. Not to mention, poorly chosen.shog[1].gif

Seriously nobody cares. Post up. Dont be shy.
post #39051 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

Most excellent reply, Dino. As I expected it to be.

Thanks Bro! :fistbump:

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tried and True View Post


Too garish for TWAT, I'm afraid. Not to mention, poorly chosen.shog[1].gif

I agree with Stitch and Keith T, lets see some more watch porn.  Its always fun to see watch photos from fellow collectors.  Cheers!

post #39052 of 48312
i just had the thomas preik sapphire caseback installed on my rolex GMT II



quite happy with it. install was minutes and it was pressure tested perfectly.

purists may not approve but i think it's nice / important to be able to see the movement and these pieces are great quality and take minutes to switch back if you go to sell it to someone who doesnt want it.
post #39053 of 48312

^^ Better put some sunblock on that movement. I don't think was intended to ever see the light of day.

post #39054 of 48312
^

I'm as curmudgeonly as it gets, and I have no issue with that. Looks pretty cool, in fact. I would consider doing the same to my Daytona, as I currently don't have a single watch with a display back and sometimes it's nice to see what makes it tick. And as you said, it's easily reversible.
Nice!
post #39055 of 48312
I would always prefer a sapphire caseback because I'm more interested in looking at the movement than anything else. Can't even imagine why a purist would have an opinion one way or another. I can't wait until my inbound Nomos finally arrives so I can ogle the movement!
post #39056 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

Seriously nobody cares. Post up. Dont be shy.

+1

I posted my puny collection--Tag Heuers and Girard Perregaux included--and lived to tell the tale.

Do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bings View Post

i just had the thomas preik sapphire caseback installed on my rolex GMT II
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

quite happy with it. install was minutes and it was pressure tested perfectly.

purists may not approve but i think it's nice / important to be able to see the movement and these pieces are great quality and take minutes to switch back if you go to sell it to someone who doesnt want it.

I like this. Not sure I'd go to the trouble on my Sub, but I still think it's kind of cool. Wouldn't feel that way if it weren't so easily reversible, but it is, as you point out.
post #39057 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnFacconable View Post

I would always prefer a sapphire caseback because I'm more interested in looking at the movement than anything else. Can't even imagine why a purist would have an opinion one way or another. 

As long as the owner keeps the original back its fine.  The main things for a Purists, is probably originality.  Beyond that if it were a very collectible piece, say a 1675, 6263, 1655, anything aftermarket lowers its value...but as mentioned if the owner holds onto the original back no issues (just don't misplace it).  Then there is service, if you want to have Rolex service it, you have to swap back to the original, or have someone do that for you, if you can't do it yourself.  Rolex, at least in the US, will not service any watch with aftermarket parts.  You have to re-install the original parts, or buy new ones from Rolex (in which case they confiscate the aftermarket parts), if you want them to work on a watch currently equipped with aftermarket parts.    

post #39058 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino944 View Post

As long as the owner keeps the original back its fine.  The main things for a Purists, is probably originality.  Beyond that if it were a very collectible piece, say a 1675, 6263, 1655, anything aftermarket lowers its value...but as mentioned if the owner holds onto the original back no issues (just don't misplace it).  Then there is service, if you want to have Rolex service it, you have to swap back to the original, or have someone do that for you, if you can't do it yourself.  Rolex, at least in the US, will not service any watch with aftermarket parts.  You have to re-install the original parts, or buy new ones from Rolex (in which case they confiscate the aftermarket parts), if you want them to work on a watch currently equipped with aftermarket parts.    

Sure, I would understand a purist not wanting to buy the watch without the original caseback or even someone having a concern that the watch is infinitesimally worse off for having switched casebacks outside of a Rolex service center, but there's this weird notion in the watch world of appearing purists as if you need sign off from the counsel of elders before swapping straps. I'm not saying that bings cares about any of that stuff, but there are certainly people out there that do.

In other news, I'm more than a little concerned that many if not most of my shirt cuffs will catch on my watch. I've never worn a watch consistently but in preparation for my decision to wear a watch daily I've been practicing with watches I have laying around and have realized that all of my custom shirts are sized to my wrist, and the majority of my off the rack shirts leave very little room. Barrel cuffs seem to be the worst offenders. I don't have a large wrist so I'm not sure why this is the case, but will be interesting to see how it goes. I'm not committed enough to wearing a watch that I would bother taking all my shirts to a tailor to redo the buttons so I might just need to limit watch wear to the shirts where it works out. A lot of watch people say that once you get a nice watch you can't stop at one, but this is one of the factors that may very well limit my collecting.
post #39059 of 48312
Just move the button. You don't need a tailor for that. Takes less than five minutes per shirt.
post #39060 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belligero View Post

Just move the button. You don't need a tailor for that. Takes less than five minutes per shirt.

Yeah, I guess come to think of it my nanny is always asking if we have any mending work she can do, so this would probably be a good project for her.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)